Literature DB >> 26583482

Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Saradha Ananthakrishnan1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Edward Bartlett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) typically experience reduced speech perception, which is not completely restored with amplification. This likely occurs because cochlear damage, in addition to elevating audiometric thresholds, alters the neural representation of speech transmitted to higher centers along the auditory neuroaxis. While the deleterious effects of SNHL on speech perception in humans have been well-documented using behavioral paradigms, our understanding of the neural correlates underlying these perceptual deficits remains limited. Using the scalp-recorded frequency following response (FFR), the authors examine the effects of SNHL and aging on subcortical neural representation of acoustic features important for pitch and speech perception, namely the periodicity envelope (F0) and temporal fine structure (TFS; formant structure), as reflected in the phase-locked neural activity generating the FFR.
DESIGN: FFRs were obtained from 10 listeners with normal hearing (NH) and 9 listeners with mild-moderate SNHL in response to a steady-state English back vowel /u/ presented at multiple intensity levels. Use of multiple presentation levels facilitated comparisons at equal sound pressure level (SPL) and equal sensation level. In a second follow-up experiment to address the effect of age on envelope and TFS representation, FFRs were obtained from 25 NH and 19 listeners with mild to moderately severe SNHL to the same vowel stimulus presented at 80 dB SPL. Temporal waveforms, Fast Fourier Transform and spectrograms were used to evaluate the magnitude of the phase-locked activity at F0 (periodicity envelope) and F1 (TFS).
RESULTS: Neural representation of both envelope (F0) and TFS (F1) at equal SPLs was stronger in NH listeners compared with listeners with SNHL. Also, comparison of neural representation of F0 and F1 across stimulus levels expressed in SPL and sensation level (accounting for audibility) revealed that level-related changes in F0 and F1 magnitude were different for listeners with SNHL compared with listeners with NH. Furthermore, the degradation in subcortical neural representation was observed to persist in listeners with SNHL even when the effects of age were controlled for.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results suggest a relatively greater degradation in the neural representation of TFS compared with periodicity envelope in individuals with SNHL. This degraded neural representation of TFS in SNHL, as reflected in the brainstem FFR, may reflect a disruption in the temporal pattern of phase-locked neural activity arising from altered tonotopic maps and/or wider filters causing poor frequency selectivity in these listeners. Finally, while preliminary results indicate that the deleterious effects of SNHL may be greater than age-related degradation in subcortical neural representation, the lack of a balanced age-matched control group in this study does not permit us to completely rule out the effects of age on subcortical neural representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26583482      PMCID: PMC4767571          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  47 in total

1.  Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A unitary model of pitch perception.

Authors:  R Meddis; L O'Mard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Responses to speech signals in the normal and pathological peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  A R Palmer; P A Moorjani
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses.

Authors:  S P Bacon; R M Gleitman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06

8.  Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones.

Authors:  S Greenberg; J T Marsh; W S Brown; J C Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Frequency discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  H J Simon; E W Yund
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  11 in total

1.  Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Casey Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Xin Luo; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Noninvasive Measures of Distorted Tonotopic Speech Coding Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-13

Review 5.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Causal Relationship between the Right Auditory Cortex and Speech-Evoked Envelope-Following Response: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Stimulation and Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Guangting Mai; Peter Howell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adult Hearing Aid Users: Effects of Aiding and Background Noise, and Prediction of Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  Ghada BinKhamis; Antonio Elia Forte; Tobias Reichenbach; Martin O'Driscoll; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  David M Kessler; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Spencer B Smith; Kristen D'Onofrio; René H Gifford
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Spectrally specific temporal analyses of spike-train responses to complex sounds: A unifying framework.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Hari Bharadwaj; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.