Literature DB >> 33306546

Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Stacey G Kane1, Emily Buss, John H Grose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure low-rate binaural frequency modulation (FM) detection across the lifespan as a gauge of temporal fine structure processing. Children and older adults were expected to perform more poorly than young adults but for different reasons.
DESIGN: Detection of 2-Hz FM carried by a 500-Hz pure tone was measured for modulators that were either in-phase or out-of-phase across ears. Thresholds were measured in quiet and in noise. Participants were school-age children (n = 44), young adults (n = 11), and older adults (n = 17) with normal or near-normal hearing.
RESULTS: Thresholds were lower for out-of-phase than in-phase modulators among all listening groups. Detection thresholds improved with child age, with larger effects of age for dichotic than diotic FM. Introduction of masking noise tended to elevate thresholds; this effect was larger for the dichotic condition than the diotic condition, and larger for older adults than young adults. In noise, young adults received the greatest dichotic benefit, followed by older adults, then young children. The relative effects of noise on dichotic benefit did not differ for young adults compared to young children and older adults; however, young children saw greater reduction in benefit due to noise than older adults.
CONCLUSION: The difference in dichotic benefit between children and young adults is consistent with maturation of central auditory processing. Differences in the effect of noise on dichotic benefit in young children and older adults support the idea that different factors or combinations of factors limit performance in these two groups. Although dichotic FM detection appears to be more sensitive to the effects of development and aging than diotic FM detection, the positive correlation between diotic and dichotic FM detection thresholds for all listeners suggests contribution of one or more factors common to both conditions.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33306546      PMCID: PMC8087618          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  43 in total

1.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  The human auditory system: a timeline of development.

Authors:  Jean K Moore; Fred H Linthicum
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Development of a fast method for determining sensitivity to temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Aleksander Sek
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Shuman He; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Christine R Mason; Timothy M Streeter; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Relating age and hearing loss to monaural, bilateral, and binaural temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Garnett P McMillan; Michelle R Molis; Sean D Kampel; Serena M Dann; Dawn L Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.