Literature DB >> 18247642

Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves.

Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli1, Michael G Heinz.   

Abstract

Near-Poisson variability in auditory-nerve (AN) responses limits the accuracy of automated tuning-curve algorithms. Here, a typical adaptive tuning-curve algorithm was used with a physiologically realistic AN model with and without the inclusion of neural randomness. Response randomness produced variability in Q(10) estimates that was nearly as large as in AN data. Results suggest that it is sufficient for AN models to specify frequency selectivity based on mean Q(10) values at each characteristic frequency (CF). Errors in estimates of CF, which decreased from +/-0.2 octaves at low frequencies to +/-0.05 octaves at high frequencies, are significant for studies of spatiotemporal coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18247642      PMCID: PMC2911360          DOI: 10.1121/1.2794880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression.

Authors:  X Zhang; M G Heinz; I C Bruce; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Ian C Bruce; Murray B Sachs; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Binaural and cochlear disparities.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram Van de Sande; Dries H Louage; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The frequency response and other properties of single fibres in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve.

Authors:  E F Evans
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

1.  Implications of within-fiber temporal coding for perceptual studies of F0 discrimination and discrimination of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Christophe Micheyl; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

3.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal modulation transfer functions measured from auditory-nerve responses following sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Divergent Auditory Nerve Encoding Deficits Between Two Common Etiologies of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Mark Sayles; Ann E Hickox; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Auditory brainstem responses predict auditory nerve fiber thresholds and frequency selectivity in hearing impaired chinchillas.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Sushrut Kale; Ryan E Scheidt; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Envelope coding in auditory nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-16

8.  Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Ryan E Scheidt; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Distorted Tonotopic Coding of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.