Literature DB >> 18632887

Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Erik Larsen1, Leonardo Cedolin, Bertrand Delgutte.   

Abstract

Pitch differences between concurrent sounds are important cues used in auditory scene analysis and also play a major role in music perception. To investigate the neural codes underlying these perceptual abilities, we recorded from single fibers in the cat auditory nerve in response to two concurrent harmonic complex tones with missing fundamentals and equal-amplitude harmonics. We investigated the efficacy of rate-place and interspike-interval codes to represent both pitches of the two tones, which had fundamental frequency (F0) ratios of 15/14 or 11/9. We relied on the principle of scaling invariance in cochlear mechanics to infer the spatiotemporal response patterns to a given stimulus from a series of measurements made in a single fiber as a function of F0. Templates created by a peripheral auditory model were used to estimate the F0s of double complex tones from the inferred distribution of firing rate along the tonotopic axis. This rate-place representation was accurate for F0s greater, similar900 Hz. Surprisingly, rate-based F0 estimates were accurate even when the two-tone mixture contained no resolved harmonics, so long as some harmonics were resolved prior to mixing. We also extended methods used previously for single complex tones to estimate the F0s of concurrent complex tones from interspike-interval distributions pooled over the tonotopic axis. The interval-based representation was accurate for F0s less, similar900 Hz, where the two-tone mixture contained no resolved harmonics. Together, the rate-place and interval-based representations allow accurate pitch perception for concurrent sounds over the entire range of human voice and cat vocalizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632887      PMCID: PMC2544468          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01361.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  68 in total

1.  Vowel-specific effects in concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal properties of responses to broadband noise in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Dries H G Louage; Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The case of the missing delay lines: synthetic delays obtained by cross-channel phase interaction.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform.

Authors:  R D Patterson; M H Allerhand; C Giguère
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The representation of concurrent vowels in the cat anesthetized ventral cochlear nucleus: evidence for a periodicity-tagged spectral representation.

Authors:  S E Keilson; V M Richards; B T Wyman; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitches of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  P F Assmann; D D Paschall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Temporal representation of rippled noise in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla.

Authors:  W P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  28 in total

1.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural representation of harmonic complex tones in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Responses in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig to concurrent harmonic series and the effect of inactivation of descending controls.

Authors:  Kyle T Nakamoto; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sensitivity of cochlear nucleus neurons to spatio-temporal changes in auditory nerve activity.

Authors:  Grace I Wang; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Computational model predictions of cues for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-08

9.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.