Literature DB >> 26888932

Distorted Tonotopic Coding of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Kenneth S Henry1, Sushrut Kale2, Michael G Heinz3.   

Abstract

People with cochlear hearing loss have substantial difficulty understanding speech in real-world listening environments (e.g., restaurants), even with amplification from a modern digital hearing aid. Unfortunately, a disconnect remains between human perceptual studies implicating diminished sensitivity to fast acoustic temporal fine structure (TFS) and animal studies showing minimal changes in neural coding of TFS or slower envelope (ENV) structure. Here, we used general system-identification (Wiener kernel) analyses of chinchilla auditory nerve fiber responses to Gaussian noise to reveal pronounced distortions in tonotopic coding of TFS and ENV following permanent, noise-induced hearing loss. In basal fibers with characteristic frequencies (CFs) >1.5 kHz, hearing loss introduced robust nontonotopic coding (i.e., at the wrong cochlear place) of low-frequency TFS, while ENV responses typically remained at CF. As a consequence, the highest dominant frequency of TFS coding in response to Gaussian noise was 2.4 kHz in noise-overexposed fibers compared with 4.5 kHz in control fibers. Coding of ENV also became nontonotopic in more pronounced cases of cochlear damage. In apical fibers, more classical hearing-loss effects were observed, i.e., broadened tuning without a significant shift in best frequency. Because these distortions and dissociations of TFS/ENV disrupt tonotopicity, a fundamental principle of auditory processing necessary for robust signal coding in background noise, these results have important implications for understanding communication difficulties faced by people with hearing loss. Further, hearing aids may benefit from distinct amplification strategies for apical and basal cochlear regions to address fundamentally different coding deficits. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Speech-perception problems associated with noise overexposure are pervasive in today's society, even with modern digital hearing aids. Unfortunately, the underlying physiological deficits in neural coding remain unclear. Here, we used innovative system-identification analyses of auditory nerve fiber responses to Gaussian noise to uncover pronounced distortions in coding of rapidly varying acoustic temporal fine structure and slower envelope cues following noise trauma. Because these distortions degrade and diminish the tonotopic representation of temporal acoustic features, a fundamental principle of auditory processing, the results represent a critical advancement in our understanding of the physiological bases of communication disorders. The detailed knowledge provided by this work will help guide the design of signal-processing strategies aimed at alleviating everyday communication problems for people with hearing loss.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/362227-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wiener kernel analyses; auditory nerve; noise-induced hearing loss; speech perception; temporal coding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26888932      PMCID: PMC4756156          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3944-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Tuning and timing in the gerbil ear: Wiener-kernel analysis.

Authors:  Edwin R Lewis; Kenneth R Henry; Walter M Yamada
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification.

Authors:  J G Clark
Journal:  ASHA       Date:  1981-07

6.  Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some aspects of temporal coding by single cochlear fibres from regions of cochlear hair cell degeneration in the guinea pig.

Authors:  R V Harrison; E F Evans
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

8.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Noise-induced hearing loss increases the temporal precision of complex envelope coding by auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-17
View more
  14 in total

1.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Divergent Auditory Nerve Encoding Deficits Between Two Common Etiologies of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Mark Sayles; Ann E Hickox; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?

Authors:  Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  The Relationship between Temporal Integration and Temporal Envelope Perception in Noise by Males with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Saransh Jain; Nuggehalli Puttareviyah Nataraja
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  [The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].

Authors:  David Bächinger; Raphael Jecker; Jean-Christoph Hannig; Andreas Werner; Horst Hildebrandt; Michael Eidenbenz; Martin Kompis; Tobias Kleinjung; Dorothe Veraguth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 1.330

7.  Temporal Coding of Single Auditory Nerve Fibers Is Not Degraded in Aging Gerbils.

Authors:  Amarins N Heeringa; Lichun Zhang; Go Ashida; Rainer Beutelmann; Friederike Steenken; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Specific loss of neural sensitivity to interaural time difference of unmodulated noise stimuli following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Hariprakash Haragopal; Ryan Dorkoski; Austin R Pollard; Gareth A Whaley; Timothy R Wohl; Noelle C Stroud; Mitchell L Day
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Noninvasive Measures of Distorted Tonotopic Speech Coding Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-13

10.  Binaural Diplacusis and Its Relationship with Hearing-Threshold Asymmetry.

Authors:  David Colin; Christophe Micheyl; Anneline Girod; Eric Truy; Stéphane Gallégo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.