Literature DB >> 19173391

Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal.

Christian Lorenzi1, Louis Debruille, Stéphane Garnier, Pierre Fleuriot, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

The identification of nonsense syllables that were lowpass filtered at 1.5 kHz was compared for subjects with normal hearing and subjects with mild-to-severe hearing loss at high frequencies but with normal or near-normal hearing at low frequencies. Absolute thresholds were mostly within the normal range (<20 dB hearing level) for both groups for frequencies below 1.5 kHz. Performance was assessed with intact speech, speech that had been processed to preserve only temporal envelope cues in a few frequency bands (E speech), and speech that had been processed to remove envelope cues as far as possible while preserving temporal fine structure cues, again in a few frequency bands (TFS speech). For the intact speech and E speech, the hearing-impaired subjects performed slightly more poorly than the normal-hearing subjects, but this effect was significant only for the intact speech. For the TFS speech, the hearing-impaired subjects performed significantly more poorly than the normal-hearing subjects, with 12 out of 16 of the former performing at chance. The results indicate that, for people with hearing loss at medium to high frequencies, the processing of the TFS of speech can be degraded for frequencies where absolute thresholds are within the normal range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173391     DOI: 10.1121/1.2939125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

3.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

5.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Michelle Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-25

7.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Frederick J Gallun; Marjorie R Leek; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard T Penninger; Wade W Chien; Patpong Jiradejvong; Emily Boeke; Courtney L Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

10.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.