Literature DB >> 23250685

Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Ching-Chih Wu1, Xin Luo.   

Abstract

The large spread of excitation is a major cause of poor spectral resolution for cochlear implant (CI) users. Partial tripolar (pTP) mode has been proposed to reduce current spread by returning an equally distributed fraction (0.5 × σ) of current to two flanking electrodes and the rest to an extra-cochlear ground. This study tested the efficacy of incorporating current steering into pTP mode to add spectral channels. Different proportions of current [α × σ and (1 - α) × σ] were returned to the basal and apical flanking electrodes respectively to shape the electric field. Loudness and pitch perception with α from 0 to 1 in steps of 0.1 was simulated with a computational model of CI stimulation and tested on the apical, middle, and basal electrodes of six CI subjects. The highest σ allowing for full loudness growth within the implant compliance limit was chosen for each main electrode. Pitch ranking was measured between pairs of loudness-balanced steered pTP stimuli with an α interval of 0.1 at the most comfortable level. Results demonstrated that steered pTP stimuli with α around 0.5 required more current to achieve equal loudness than those with α around 0 or 1, maybe due to more focused excitation patterns. Subjects usually perceived decreasing pitches as α increased from 0 to 1, somewhat consistent with the apical shift of the center of gravity of excitation pattern in the model. Pitch discrimination was not better with α around 0.5 than with α around 0 or 1, except for some subjects and electrodes. For three subjects with better pitch discrimination, about half of the pitch ranges of two adjacent main electrodes overlapped with each other in steered pTP mode. These results suggest that current steering with focused pTP mode may improve spectral resolution and pitch perception with CIs.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23250685      PMCID: PMC3660915          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0366-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  30 in total

1.  The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

3.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen; Louise M Richardson; Elaine Saunders; Robert S C Cowan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

5.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; D Mortazavi; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans.

Authors:  J B Nadol; J Y Shiao; B J Burgess; D R Ketten; D K Eddington; B J Gantz; I Kos; P Montandon; N J Coker; J T Roland; J K Shallop
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

9.  Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more
  9 in total

1.  Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

2.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

3.  Symmetric Electrode Spanning Narrows the Excitation Patterns of Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

4.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Combining current focusing and steering in a cochlear implant processing strategy.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu; Kathryn Pulling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  An Instrumented Cochlea Model for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrical Stimulus Spread.

Authors:  Chen Jiang; Shreya Singhal; Thomas Landry; Iwan Roberts; Simone de Rijk; Tim Brochier; Tobias Goehring; Yu Tam; Robert Carlyon; George Malliaras; Manohar Bance
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Temporal properties of inferior colliculus neurons to photonic stimulation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Xiaodong Tan; Hunter Young; Agnella Izzo Matic; Whitney Zirkle; Suhrud Rajguru; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-08

9.  Objective assessment of spectral ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners using cortical evoked responses to an oddball paradigm.

Authors:  Alejandro Lopez Valdes; Myles Mc Laughlin; Laura Viani; Peter Walshe; Jaclyn Smith; Fan-Gang Zeng; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.