Literature DB >> 22230370

Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users.

David M Landsberger1, Monica Padilla, Arthi G Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant performance in difficult listening situations is limited by channel interactions. It is known that partial tripolar (PTP) stimulation reduces the spread of excitation (SOE). However, the greater the degree of current focusing, the greater the absolute current required to maintain a fixed loudness. As current increases, so does SOE. In experiment 1, the SOE for equally loud stimuli with different degrees of current focusing is measured via a forward-masking procedure. Results suggest that at a fixed loudness, some but not all patients have a reduced SOE with PTP stimulation. Therefore, it seems likely that a PTP speech processing strategy could improve spectral resolution for only those patients with a reduced SOE. In experiment 2, the ability to discriminate different levels of current focusing was measured. In experiment 3, patients subjectively scaled verbal descriptors of stimuli of various levels of current focusing. Both discrimination and scaling of verbal descriptors correlated well with SOE reduction, suggesting that either technique have the potential to be used clinically to quickly predict which patients would receive benefit from a current focusing strategy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22230370      PMCID: PMC3289740          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  33 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory cortical images of tones and noise bands.

Authors:  J G Arenberg; S Furukawa; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09

4.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J J Briaire; J H Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

6.  Short-term study of the effect of speech coding strategy on the auditory performance of pre- and post-lingually deafened adults implanted with the Clarion CII.

Authors:  R Filipo; P Mancini; D Ballantyne; E Bosco; C D'Elia
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Luc Geurts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  B E Pfingst; K H Franck; L Xu; E M Bauer; T A Zwolan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-06

9.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; David M Landsberger; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  52 in total

1.  Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

2.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hugh J McDermott; Brett A Swanson; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-06

4.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Channel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implants.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-19

7.  Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Monica Padilla; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

10.  Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Daniel H Lee; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.