Literature DB >> 15247993

Trends in cochlear implants.

Fan-Gang Zeng1.   

Abstract

More than 60,000 people worldwide use cochlear implants as a means to restore functional hearing. Although individual performance variability is still high, an average implant user can talk on the phone in a quiet environment. Cochlear-implant research has also matured as a field, as evidenced by the exponential growth in both the patient population and scientific publication. The present report examines current issues related to audiologic, clinical, engineering, anatomic, and physiologic aspects of cochlear implants, focusing on their psychophysical, speech, music, and cognitive performance. This report also forecasts clinical and research trends related to presurgical evaluation, fitting protocols, signal processing, and postsurgical rehabilitation in cochlear implants. Finally, a future landscape in amplification is presented that requires a unique, yet complementary, contribution from hearing aids, middle ear implants, and cochlear implants to achieve a total solution to the entire spectrum of hearing loss treatment and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15247993      PMCID: PMC4111484          DOI: 10.1177/108471380400800102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  143 in total

1.  Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  A E Vandali
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  [Auditory prosthesis by means of a distant electrical stimulation of the sensory nerve with the use of an indwelt coiling].

Authors:  A DJOURNO; C EYRIES
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1957-08-31       Impact factor: 1.228

3.  Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve and auditory prostheses: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R C Bilger
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1977 May-Jun

7.  A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  C S Palmer; J K Niparko; J R Wyatt; M Rothman; G de Lissovoy
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-11

8.  Hearing after congenital deafness: central auditory plasticity and sensory deprivation.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; J Tillein; S Heid; R Klinke
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Ann Peterson; Jon Shallop; Colin Driscoll; Alyce Breneman; Julie Babb; Ruth Stoeckel; Lee Fabry
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  88 in total

1.  Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours.

Authors:  Frank Michael Digeser; Anne Hast; Thomas Wesarg; Horst Hessel; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Co-modulation of stimulus rate and current from elevated baselines expands head motion encoding range of the vestibular prosthesis.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Gene Y Fridman; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

6.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Effects of computer-assisted speech training on Mandarin-speaking hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Jiunn-Liang Wu; Hui-Mei Yang; Yi-Hui Lin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Neural integration and enhancement from the inferior colliculus up to different layers of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Malgorzata M Straka; Dillon Schendel; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.