Literature DB >> 26691160

Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Ching-Chih Wu1,2, Xin Luo3,4.   

Abstract

Current steering in partial tripolar (pTP) mode has been shown to improve pitch perception and spectral resolution with cochlear implants (CIs). In this mode, a fraction (σ) of the main electrode current is returned within the cochlea and steered between the basal and apical flanking electrodes (with a proportion of α and 1 - α, respectively). Pitch generally decreases when α increases from 0 to 1, although the salience of pitch change varies across CI users. This study aimed to identify the mechanism of pitch changes with pTP-mode current steering and the factors contributing to the intersubject variability in pitch-ranking sensitivity. The electrical fields were measured for steered pTP stimuli on the same main electrode with α = 0, 0.5, and 1 in five implanted ears using electrical field imaging (EFI). The related excitation patterns were also measured physiologically using evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and psychophysically using psychophysical forward masking (PFM). Consistent with the pitch-ranking results in this study, the EFI, ECAP, and PFM centroids shifted apically with increasing α. An apical shift was also observed for the PFM peak but not for the EFI or ECAP peak. The pattern width was similar with different α values within a given measure (e.g., EFI, ECAP, or PFM), but the ECAP patterns were broader than the EFI and PFM patterns, possibly because ECAP was measured with smaller σ values than EFI and PFM. The amount of pattern shift with α depended on σ (i.e., the total amount of current used for steering) but was not correlated with the pitch-ranking sensitivity across subjects. The results revealed that the pitch changes elicited by pTP-mode current steering were not only driven by the shifts of excitation centroid.

Keywords:  cochlear implant; compound action potential; current focusing; current steering; electrical field imaging; forward masking pattern; spread of excitation; tripolar mode

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26691160      PMCID: PMC4791419          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0549-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  30 in total

1.  Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  P J Abbas; C J Brown; J K Shallop; J B Firszt; M L Hughes; S H Hong; S J Staller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.

Authors:  Filiep J Vanpoucke; Andrzej J Zarowski; Stefaan A Peeters
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-04

4.  Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens; Carlo K Berenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28

9.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness.

Authors:  R Hinojosa; M Marion
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  4 in total

1.  Symmetric Electrode Spanning Narrows the Excitation Patterns of Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

2.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Combining current focusing and steering in a cochlear implant processing strategy.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu; Kathryn Pulling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Multichannel optrodes for photonic stimulation.

Authors:  Yingyue Xu; Nan Xia; Michelle Lim; Xiaodong Tan; Minh Ha Tran; Erin Boulger; Fei Peng; Hunter Young; Christoph Rau; Alexander Rack; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.593

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.