Literature DB >> 23159918

Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Christof Stieger1, John J Rosowski, Hideko Heidi Nakajima.   

Abstract

The cochlea is normally driven with "forward" stimulation, in which sound is introduced to the ear canal. Alternatively, the cochlea can be stimulated at the round window (RW) using an actuator. During RW "reverse" stimulation, the acoustic flow starting at the RW does not necessarily take the same path as during forward stimulation. To understand the differences between forward and reverse stimulation, we measured ear-canal pressure, stapes velocity, RW velocity, and intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli (SV) and scala tympani (ST) of fresh human temporal bones. During forward stimulation, the cochlear drive (differential pressure across the partition) results from the large difference in magnitude between the pressures of SV and ST, which occurs due to the high compliance of the RW. During reverse stimulation, the relatively high impedance of the middle ear causes the pressures of SV and ST to have similar magnitudes, and the differential pressure results primarily from the difference in phase of the pressures. Furthermore, the sound path differs between forward and reverse stimulation, such that motion through a third window is more significant during reverse stimulation. Additionally, we determined that although stapes velocity is a good estimate of cochlear drive during forward stimulation, it is not a good measure during reverse stimulation. This article is part of a special issue entitled "MEMRO 2012".
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23159918      PMCID: PMC3584235          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  The functions of the round window.

Authors:  E G WEVER; M LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  The floating mass transducer at the round window: direct transmission or bone conduction?

Authors:  Andreas Arnold; Martin Kompis; Claudia Candreia; Flurin Pfiffner; Rudolf Häusler; Christof Stieger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Factors improving the vibration transfer of the floating mass transducer at the round window.

Authors:  Andreas Arnold; Christof Stieger; Claudia Candreia; Flurin Pfiffner; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Sigfrid D Soli; Marco Carner; L Colletti
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  The equality of volume displacements in the inner ear windows.

Authors:  M Kringlebotn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Evaluation of round window stimulation using the floating mass transducer by intracochlear sound pressure measurements in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  European results with totally implantable carina placed on the round window: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Martin; Arnaud Deveze; Céline Richard; Philippe P Lefebvre; Monique Decat; Luis Garcia Ibañez; Eric Truy; Thierry Mom; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Jacques Magnan; Christian Dubreuil; Stéphane Tringali
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; Saumil N Merchant; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-09
View more
  25 in total

1.  An Intracochlear Pressure Sensor as a Microphone for a Fully Implantable Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Francis Pete X Creighton; Xiying Guan; Steve Park; Ioannis John Kymissis; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Salwa F Masud; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch.

Authors:  David Chhan; Peter Bowers; Melissa L McKinnon; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Human middle-ear model with compound eardrum and airway branching in mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion during round window stimulation in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Yongzheng Chen; Xiying Guan; Tianyu Zhang; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  Optimisation of the round window opening in cochlear implant surgery in wet and dry conditions: impact on intracochlear pressure changes.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; A Ernst; M Mittmann; I Todt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Christof Stieger; Daniel J Lee; Julie P Merchant; Wilko Grolman; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones During Bone Conduction Stimulation.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; Xiying Guan; Rosemary B Farahmand; Brent F Page; Julie P Merchant; Defne Abur; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-31

9.  Implications for Bone Conduction Mechanisms from Thresholds of Post Radical Mastoidectomy and Subtotal Petrosectomy Patients.

Authors:  Michal Kaufmann Yehezkely; Golda Grinblat; Miriam Geal Dor; Shai Chordekar; Ronen Perez; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 10.  Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Peter Bowers; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.