Francis Pete X Creighton1, Xiying Guan, Steve Park, Ioannis John Kymissis, Hideko Heidi Nakajima, Elizabeth S Olson. 1. *Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston†Harvard Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts‡Department of Electrical Engineering§Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center¶Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, New York||Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejon, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate an intracochlear piezoelectric sensor for its ability to detect intracochlear pressure and function as a microphone for a fully implantable cochlear implant. METHODS: A polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric pressure sensor was inserted into a human fresh cadaveric round window at varying depths. An external sound pressure stimulus was applied to the external auditory canal (EAC). EAC pressure, stapes velocity, and piezoelectric sensor voltage output were recorded. RESULTS: The PVDF sensor was able to detect the intracochlear sound pressure response to an acoustic input to the EAC. The frequency response of the pressure measured with the intracochlear sensor was similar to that of the pressure at the EAC, with the expected phase delay of the middle ear transmission. The magnitude of the response increased and smoothened with respect to frequency as the sensor was inserted more deeply into the scala tympani. Artifact measurements, made with the sensor in air near the round window, showed flat frequency response in both magnitude and phase, which were distinct from those measured when the sensor was inserted in the round window. CONCLUSION: This study describes a novel method of measuring intracochlear pressure for an otologic microphone composed of a piezoelectric polymer, and demonstrates feasibility. Our next goal is to improve device sensitivity and bandwidth. Our long-term objective is to imbed the piezoelectric sensor within a conventional cochlear implant electrode, to enable a device to both measure intracochlear sound pressure and deliver electrical stimulus to the cochlea, for a fully implantable cochlear implant.
OBJECTIVE: To validate an intracochlear piezoelectric sensor for its ability to detect intracochlear pressure and function as a microphone for a fully implantable cochlear implant. METHODS: A polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric pressure sensor was inserted into a human fresh cadaveric round window at varying depths. An external sound pressure stimulus was applied to the external auditory canal (EAC). EAC pressure, stapes velocity, and piezoelectric sensor voltage output were recorded. RESULTS: The PVDF sensor was able to detect the intracochlear sound pressure response to an acoustic input to the EAC. The frequency response of the pressure measured with the intracochlear sensor was similar to that of the pressure at the EAC, with the expected phase delay of the middle ear transmission. The magnitude of the response increased and smoothened with respect to frequency as the sensor was inserted more deeply into the scala tympani. Artifact measurements, made with the sensor in air near the round window, showed flat frequency response in both magnitude and phase, which were distinct from those measured when the sensor was inserted in the round window. CONCLUSION: This study describes a novel method of measuring intracochlear pressure for an otologic microphone composed of a piezoelectric polymer, and demonstrates feasibility. Our next goal is to improve device sensitivity and bandwidth. Our long-term objective is to imbed the piezoelectric sensor within a conventional cochlear implant electrode, to enable a device to both measure intracochlear sound pressure and deliver electrical stimulus to the cochlea, for a fully implantable cochlear implant.
Authors: Douglas A Chen; Douglas D Backous; Moisés A Arriaga; Renee Garvin; Deborah Kobylek; Thomas Littman; Sue Walgren; David Lura Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: N Donnelly; A Bibas; D Jiang; D-E Bamiou; C Santulli; G Jeronimidis; A Fitzgerald O'Connor Journal: J Laryngol Otol Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 1.469
Authors: Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; Saumil N Merchant; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2008-12-09
Authors: Steve Park; Xiying Guan; Youngwan Kim; Francis Pete X Creighton; Eric Wei; Ioannis John Kymissis; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Elizabeth S Olson Journal: Trends Hear Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.293
Authors: Ki Woong Seong; Ha Jun Mun; Dong Ho Shin; Jong Hoon Kim; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Sunil Puria; Jin-Ho Cho Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Guy Fierens; Charlotte Borgers; Tristan Putzeys; Joris Walraevens; Astrid Van Wieringen; Nicolas Verhaert Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 3.411