Literature DB >> 29169906

Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear.

John J Rosowski1, Peter Bowers2, Hideko H Nakajima2.   

Abstract

While most models of cochlear function assume the presence of only two windows into the mammalian cochlea (the oval and round windows), a position that is generally supported by several lines of data, there is evidence for additional sound paths into and out of the inner ear in normal mammals. In this report we review the existing evidence for and against the 'two-window' hypothesis. We then determine how existing data and inner-ear anatomy restrict transmission of sound through these additional sound pathways in cat by utilizing a well-tested model of the cat inner ear, together with anatomical descriptions of the cat cochlear and vestibular aqueducts (potential additional windows to the cochlea). We conclude: (1) The existing data place limits on the size of the cochlear and vestibular aqueducts in cat and are consistent with small volume-velocities through these ducts during ossicular stimulation of the cochlea, (2) the predicted volume velocities produced by aqueducts with diameters half the size of the bony diameters match the functional data within ±10 dB, and (3) these additional volume velocity paths contribute to the inner ear's response to non-acoustic stimulation and conductive pathology.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear aqueduct; Cochlear compression; Cochlear models; Cochlear windows; Vestibular aqueduct

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29169906      PMCID: PMC5834374          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  An empirical bound on the compressibility of the cochlea.

Authors:  C A Shera; G Zweig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  S Puria; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Round window closure affects cochlear responses to suprathreshold stimuli.

Authors:  Qunfeng Cai; Carolyn Whitcomb; Jessica Eggleston; Wei Sun; Richard Salvi; Bo Hua Hu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Sigfrid D Soli; Marco Carner; L Colletti
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Non-syndromal round window atresia: an autosomal dominant genetic disorder with variable penetrance?

Authors:  A Borrmann; W Arnold
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Achille M Beltrame; Alessandro Martini; Silvano Prosser; Nadia Giarbini; Christian Streitberger
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Fully implantable hearing device with transducer on the round window as a treatment of mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Nick Pergola; Paul Berger; Christian Dubreuil
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.863

9.  Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; Saumil N Merchant; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-09

10.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones.

Authors:  Darcy L Frear; Xiying Guan; Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.