Literature DB >> 30171386

Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones During Bone Conduction Stimulation.

Christof Stieger1,2,3,4, Xiying Guan5, Rosemary B Farahmand5, Brent F Page5, Julie P Merchant5, Defne Abur5,6, Hideko Heidi Nakajima7,5.   

Abstract

Bone conduction (BC) is heavily relied upon in the diagnosis and treatment of hearing loss, but is poorly understood. For example, the relative importance and frequency dependence of various identified BC sound transmission mechanisms that contribute to activate the cochlear partition remain unknown. Recently, we have developed techniques in fresh human cadaveric specimens to directly measure scalae pressures with micro-fiberoptic sensors, enabling us to monitor the input pressure drive across the cochlear partition that triggers the cochlear traveling wave during air conduction (AC) and round-window stimulation. However, BC stimulation poses challenges that can result in inaccurate intracochlear pressure measurements. Therefore, we have developed a new technique described here that allows for precise measurements during BC. Using this new technique, we found that BC stimulation resulted in pressure in scala vestibuli that was significantly higher in magnitude than in scala tympani for most frequencies, such that the differential pressure across the partition-the input pressure drive-was similar to scala vestibuli pressure. BC (stimulated by a Bone Anchored Hearing Aid [Baha]) showed that the mechanisms of sound transmission in BC differ from AC, and also showed the limitations of the Baha bandwidth. Certain kinematic measurements were generally proportional to the cochlear pressure input drive: for AC, velocity of the stapes, and for BC, low-frequency acceleration and high-frequency velocity of the cochlear promontory. Therefore, our data show that to estimate cochlear input drive in normal ears during AC, stapes velocity is a good measure. During BC, cochlear input drive can be estimated for low frequencies by promontory acceleration (though variable across ears), and for high frequencies by promontory velocity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone conduction; fiberoptic pressure sensors; human temporal bone; intracochlear pressure; laser Doppler velocity measurements; normal hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30171386      PMCID: PMC6226413          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-00684-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  44 in total

1.  A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  S Puria; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Round window membrane motion with air conduction and bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Ossicular resonance modes of the human middle ear for bone and air conduction.

Authors:  Kenji Homma; Yu Du; Yoshitaka Shimizu; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Intracochlear Measurements of Interaural Time and Level Differences Conveyed by Bilateral Bone Conduction Systems.

Authors:  Nyssa F Farrell; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Victor Benichoux; Andrew D Brown; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea.

Authors:  V Nedzelnitsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Effects of ear-canal pressurization on middle-ear bone- and air-conduction responses.

Authors:  Kenji Homma; Yoshitaka Shimizu; Namkeun Kim; Yu Du; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal as a cause of an air-bone gap on audiometry: a case study.

Authors:  Kenneth M Cox; Daniel J Lee; John P Carey; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Comparison of Intracochlear Pressures During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Stimulation With a Bone Conduction Implant.

Authors:  Jameson K Mattingly; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; Stephen P Cass; Nathaniel T Greene
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The Impact of Location and Device Coupling on the Performance of the Osia System Actuator.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Charlotte Borgers; Tristan Putzeys; Joris Walraevens; Astrid Van Wieringen; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Bone-conduction hyperacusis induced by superior canal dehiscence in human: the underlying mechanism.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Y Song Cheng; Deepa J Galaiya; John J Rosowski; Daniel J Lee; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.