Literature DB >> 19890224

European results with totally implantable carina placed on the round window: 2-year follow-up.

Christian Martin1, Arnaud Deveze, Céline Richard, Philippe P Lefebvre, Monique Decat, Luis Garcia Ibañez, Eric Truy, Thierry Mom, Jean-Pierre Lavieille, Jacques Magnan, Christian Dubreuil, Stéphane Tringali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: First, to assess for the performance of the Carina placed on the round window at various European centers; second, to study the follow-up after 2 years and discuss limitations and technical issues; and finally, to further develop our understanding of the principles of acoustic transfer through the round window.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients were included in this retrospective study (7 women and 4 men) from 7 European tertiary referral hospitals (4 centers in France, 2 in Belgium, 1 in Spain). The mean age was 50.8 years (35-71 yr). All patients have multiple previous surgeries (>3 surgical procedures) for otosclerosis (3 patients) or chronic otitis media (8 patients), and in all cases, the stapes was not accessible due to obliteration by sclerotic tissue. Preoperative and postoperative air conduction, bone conduction, as well as aided and unaided thresholds and speech scores were measured.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between preoperative and postoperative air-conduction and bone-conduction pure-tone averages. The average free field functional gain obtained with the implant ranged from 22 to 42 dB at each individual frequency, with a mean of 29 +/- 5 dB across all audiometric frequencies. Word recognition scores demonstrated significant differences between unaided and implant-aided conditions. Complications included 2 cases of postoperative infection (including 1 anacusis) that required explantation, and 1 case reduced initial benefit, followed by a nonfunctioning device. In 10 patients, postoperative hearing was unchanged. The 8 other patients are using their implant daily.
CONCLUSION: These results show that this option is valid for patients with a fixed footplate and unsuccessful previous surgeries or patients who cannot benefit from a stapedotomy for anatomic reasons. In some cases, access to the round window membrane could represent a limitation. However, these promising initial results establish the need for further works with regard to 3 issues: 1) clinical data studies are needed, including a greater number of patients to confirm these preliminary results; 2) a long-term follow-up must be performed to detect any possible cochlear adverse effects, in particular, on the basilar membrane; 3) the effect of fascia interposition and tip size has to be evaluated in experimental studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19890224     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c34898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  22 in total

1.  Results and complications of the Baha system (bone-anchored hearing aid).

Authors:  G Ricci; A Della Volpe; M Faralli; F Longari; M Gullà; N Mansi; A Frenguelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Controlling the position and the dislocation of the middle ear transducer with high-resolution computed tomography and digital volume tomography: implications for the transducers' design.

Authors:  Georgios Kontorinis; Anja M Giesemann; Thomas Witt; Friedrich Goetz; Burkard Schwab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Round window membrane implantation with an active middle ear implant: a study of the effects on the performance of round window exposure and transducer tip diameter in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Kanthaiah Koka; Arnaud Deveze; N Julian Holland; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Feasibility of an implanted microphone for cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gérard; Laurent Demanez; Caroline Salmon; Filiep Vanpoucke; Joris Walraevens; Anke Plasmans; Daniele De Siati; Philippe Lefèbvre
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; James R Easter; Mohamed A Alhussaini; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion during round window stimulation in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Yongzheng Chen; Xiying Guan; Tianyu Zhang; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 8.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  The location of the mastoid portion of the facial nerve in patients with congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  Yaoyao Fu; Peidong Dai; Tianyu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.