Literature DB >> 31058593

Implications for Bone Conduction Mechanisms from Thresholds of Post Radical Mastoidectomy and Subtotal Petrosectomy Patients.

Michal Kaufmann Yehezkely1, Golda Grinblat2, Miriam Geal Dor3, Shai Chordekar4, Ronen Perez5, Cahtia Adelman3, Haim Sohmer6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess bone conduction (BC) thresholds following radical mastoidectomy and subtotal petrosectomy, in which the tympanic membrane and the ossicular chain, responsible for osseous BC mechanisms, are surgically removed. The removal of the tympanic membrane and the ossicular chain would reduce the contributions to BC threshold of the following four osseous BC mechanisms: the occlusion effect of the external ear, middle ear ossicular chain inertia, inner ear fluid inertia, and distortion (compression-expansion) of the walls of the inner ear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BC thresholds were determined in 64 patients who underwent radical mastoidectomy and in 248 patients who underwent subtotal petrosectomy.
RESULTS: BC thresholds were normal (≤15 dB HL, i.e., better) in 19 (30%) radical mastoidectomy patients and in 19 (8%) subtotal petrosectomy patients at each of the frequencies assessed (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz).
CONCLUSION: Normal BC thresholds seen in many patients following mastoidectomy and petrosectomy may be induced by a non-osseous mechanism, and the onset ("threshold") of the classical osseous BC mechanisms may be somewhat higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31058593      PMCID: PMC6483454          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2019.6268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  18 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways.

Authors:  Elliott H Berger; Ronald W Kieper; Dan Gauger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Model predictions for bone conduction perception in the human.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Bone conduction: an explanation for this phenomenon comprising complex mechanisms.

Authors:  R Dauman
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Transmission pathways of vibratory stimulation as measured by subjective thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tomoo Watanabe; Sibylle Bertoli; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Acoustic and physiologic aspects of bone conduction hearing.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

Review 7.  Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Inner ear contribution to bone conduction hearing in the human.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Evidence of inner ear contribution in bone conduction in chinchilla.

Authors:  David Chhan; Christof Röösli; Melissa L McKinnon; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hearing at threshold intensities: by slow mechanical traveling waves or by fast cochlear fluid pressure waves.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2020-08-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.