Literature DB >> 19941946

Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation.

Hideko Heidi Nakajima1, Saumil N Merchant, John J Rosowski.   

Abstract

Round-window (RW) stimulation has improved speech perception in patients with mixed hearing loss. In cadaveric temporal bones, we recently showed that RW stimulation with an active prosthesis produced differential pressure across the cochlear partition (a measure related to cochlear transduction) similar to normal forward sound stimulation above 1 kHz, when contact area between the prosthesis and RW is secured. However, there is large variability in the hearing improvement in patients implanted with existing modified prosthesis. This is likely because the middle-ear prosthesis used for RW stimulation was designed for a very different application. In this paper, we utilize recently developed experimental techniques that allow for the calculation of performance specifications for a RW actuator. In cadaveric human temporal bones (N=3), we simultaneously measure scala vestibuli and scala tympani intracochlear pressures, as well as stapes velocity and ear-canal pressure, during normal forward sound stimulation as well as reverse RW stimulation. We then calculate specifications such as the impedance the actuator will need to oppose at the RW, the force with which it must push against the RW, and the velocity and distance by which it must move the RW to obtain cochlear stimulation equivalent to that of specific levels of ear-canal pressure under normal sound stimulation. This information is essential for adapting existing prostheses and for designing new actuators specifically for RW stimulation. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19941946      PMCID: PMC2866787          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

1.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Anatomy of the round window niche.

Authors:  B Proctor; B Bollobas; J K Niparko
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 5.  The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach.

Authors:  J H Spindel; P R Lambert; R A Ruth
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea.

Authors:  V Nedzelnitsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs.

Authors:  A Dancer; R Franke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  R Aibara; J T Welsh; S Puria; R L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Evaluation of round window stimulation using the floating mass transducer by intracochlear sound pressure measurements in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Piezoelectric middle ear implant preserving the ossicular chain.

Authors:  T Dumon; O Zennaro; J M Aran; J P Bébéar
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.346

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [The Vibrant Soundbridge as an active implant in middle ear surgery].

Authors:  T Beleites; M Bornitz; M Neudert; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Difference of auditory brainstem responses by stimulating to round and oval window in animal experiments.

Authors:  Jyung Hyun Lee; Hyo Soon Park; Qun Wei; Myoung Nam Kim; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.269

3.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  A novel mechanism of cochlear excitation during simultaneous stimulation and pressure relief through the round window.

Authors:  Thomas D Weddell; Yury M Yarin; Markus Drexl; Ian J Russell; Stephen J Elliott; Andrei N Lukashkin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Membrane curvature and connective fiber alignment in guinea pig round window membrane.

Authors:  Miguel Arriaga; Daniel N Arteaga; Dimitrios Fafalis; Michelle Yu; Xun Wang; Karen E Kasza; Anil K Lalwani; Jeffrey W Kysar
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Direct Intracochlear Acoustic Stimulation Using a PZT Microactuator.

Authors:  Chuan Luo; Irina Omelchenko; Robert Manson; Carol Robbins; Elizabeth C Oesterle; Guo Zhong Cao; I Y Shen; Clifford R Hume
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Feasibility of Round Window Stimulation by a Novel Electromagnetic Microactuator.

Authors:  Wouter Johannes van Drunen; Mathias Mueller; Anatoly Glukhovskoy; Rolf Salcher; Marc Christopher Wurz; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.