Literature DB >> 25531117

Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures.

Marlien E F Niesten1, Christof Stieger, Daniel J Lee, Julie P Merchant, Wilko Grolman, John J Rosowski, Hideko Heidi Nakajima.   

Abstract

Superior canal dehiscence (SCD) is a defect in the bony covering of the superior semicircular canal. Patients with SCD present with a wide range of symptoms, including hearing loss, yet it is unknown whether hearing is affected by parameters such as the location of the SCD. Our previous human cadaveric temporal bone study, utilizing intracochlear pressure measurements, generally showed that an increase in dehiscence size caused a low-frequency monotonic decrease in the cochlear drive across the partition, consistent with increased hearing loss. This previous study was limited to SCD sizes including and smaller than 2 mm long and 0.7 mm wide. However, the effects of larger SCDs (>2 mm long) were not studied, although larger SCDs are seen in many patients. Therefore, to answer the effect of parameters that have not been studied, this present study assessed the effect of SCD location and the effect of large-sized SCDs (>2 mm long) on intracochlear pressures. We used simultaneous measurements of sound pressures in the scala vestibuli and scala tympani at the base of the cochlea to determine the sound pressure difference across the cochlear partition - a measure of the cochlear drive in a temporal bone preparation - allowing for assessment of hearing loss. We measured the cochlear drive before and after SCDs were made at different locations (e.g. closer to the ampulla of the superior semicircular canal or closer to the common crus) and for different dehiscence sizes (including larger than 2 mm long and 0.7 mm wide). Our measurements suggest the following: (1) different SCD locations result in similar cochlear drive and (2) larger SCDs produce larger decreases in cochlear drive at low frequencies. However, the effect of SCD size seems to saturate as the size increases above 2-3 mm long and 0.7 mm wide. Although the monotonic effect was generally consistent across ears, the quantitative amount of change in cochlear drive due to dehiscence size varied across ears. Additionally, the size of the dehiscence above which the effect on hearing saturated varied across ears. These findings show that the location of the SCD does not generally influence the amount of hearing loss and that SCD size can help explain some of the variability of hearing loss in patients.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25531117      PMCID: PMC4298487          DOI: 10.1159/000366512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  19 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact.

Authors:  Wade W Chien; Kristen Janky; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Laser Doppler vibrometric assessment of middle ear motion in Thiel-embalmed heads.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; Claudia Candreia; Martin Kompis; Gudrun Herrmann; Flurin Pfiffner; Daniel Widmer; Andreas Arnold
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Acoustic effects of a superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  J C Luers; D Pazen; H Meister; M Lauxmann; A Eiber; D Beutner; K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Dominic V Pisano; Marlien E F Niesten; Saumil N Merchant; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Superior canal dehiscence syndrome associated with the superior petrosal sinus in pediatric and adult patients.

Authors:  Andrew A McCall; Michael J McKenna; Saumil N Merchant; Hugh D Curtin; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Variety of audiologic manifestations in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Fang-Lu Chi; Dong-Dong Ren; Chun-Fu Dai
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The relationship between the air-bone gap and the size of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Heng-Wai Yuen; Rudolf Boeddinghaus; Robert H Eikelboom; Marcus D Atlas
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Differential intracochlear sound pressure measurements in normal human temporal bones.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson; Saumil N Merchant; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-09

10.  Coronal computed tomography prevalence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Robert A Williamson; Jeffrey T Vrabec; Newton J Coker; Marlin Sandlin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identifying Mechanisms Behind the Tullio Phenomenon: a Computational Study Based on First Principles.

Authors:  Bernhard J Grieser; Leonhard Kleiser; Dominik Obrist
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

2.  Clinical and Physiologic Predictors and Postoperative Outcomes of Near Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Baxter; Colin McCorkle; Carolina Trevino Guajardo; Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Alex M Carter; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Salwa F Masud; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Superior Canal Dehiscence Similarly Affects Cochlear Pressures in Temporal Bones and Audiograms in Patients.

Authors:  Y Song Cheng; Stefan Raufer; Xiying Guan; Christopher F Halpin; Daniel J Lee; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones During Bone Conduction Stimulation.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; Xiying Guan; Rosemary B Farahmand; Brent F Page; Julie P Merchant; Defne Abur; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-31

8.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Drug delivery into the cochlear apex: Improved control to sequentially affect finely spaced regions along the entire length of the cochlear spiral.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; J Hartsock; J R Dornhoffer; K M Donovan; A N Salt
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones.

Authors:  Darcy L Frear; Xiying Guan; Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.