Literature DB >> 23154918

Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock.

Cornelis Slagt1, Marcel A de Leeuw, Jan Beute, Emmy Rijnsburger, Martijn Hoeksema, Jan W R Mulder, Ignacio Malagon, A B Johan Groeneveld.   

Abstract

To evaluate the 3.02 software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system for estimation of cardiac output by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis, in septic shock. Nineteen consecutive patients in septic shock were studied. FloTrac/Vigileo™ measurements (COfv) were compared with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution-derived cardiac output (COtd). The mean cardiac output was 7.7 L min(-1) and measurements correlated at r = 0.53 (P < 0.001, n = 314). In Bland-Altman plot for repeated measurements, the bias was 1.7 L min(-1) and 95 % limits of agreement (LA) were -3.0 to 6.5 L min(-1), with a %error of 53 %. The bias of COfv inversely related to systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). Above a SVR of 700 dyn s cm(-5) (n = 74), bias was 0.3 L min(-1) and 95 % LA were -1.6 to 2.2 L min(-1) (%error 32 %). Changes between consecutive measurements (n = 295) correlated at 0.67 (P < 0.001), with a bias of 0.1 % (95 % limits of agreement -17.5 to 17.0 %). All changes >10 % in both COtd and COfv (n = 46) were in the same direction. Eighty-five percent of the measurements were within the 30°-330° of the polar axis. COfv with the latest software still underestimates COtd at low SVR in septic shock. The tracking capacities of the 3.02 software are moderate-good when clinically relevant changes are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154918     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9410-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  17 in total

Review 1.  Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients.

Authors:  F D Compton; B Zukunft; C Hoffmann; W Zidek; J-H Schaefer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery.

Authors:  G Biancofiore; L A H Critchley; A Lee; L Bindi; M Bisà; M Esposito; L Meacci; R Mozzo; P DeSimone; L Urbani; F Filipponi
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration vs. thermodilution in septic shock: evolving accuracy of software versions.

Authors:  Cornelis Slagt; Jan Beute; Martijn Hoeksema; Ignacio Malagon; Jan-Willem R Mulder; Johan A B Groeneveld
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Xiao X Yang; Anna Lee
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Gernot Marx; Andrew Tan; Christopher Junker; Marc Van Nuffelen; Lars Hüter; Willy Ching; Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Nadia Anguel; Brice Naudin; Julien Jabot; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Arterial pulse cardiac output agreement with thermodilution in patients in hyperdynamic conditions.

Authors:  Giorgio Della Rocca; Maria Gabriella Costa; Paolo Chiarandini; Gaia Bertossi; Manuela Lugano; Livia Pompei; Cecilia Coccia; Mauricio Sainz-Barriga; Paolo Pietropaoli
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Christoph K Hofer; Danny Button; Luc Weibel; Michele Genoni; Andreas Zollinger
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution measurements?

Authors:  Sebastian Schramm; Eric Albrecht; Philippe Frascarolo; Pierre-Guy Chassot; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Rose-Marieke B G E Breukers; Shahrzad Sepehrkhouy; Stefan R Spiegelenberg; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  8 in total

1.  Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Jamal A Alhashemi; Adel M Al-Shabasy; Ursina M Schmid; Peter Schott; Sanaa A Shalabi; Ahmed M Badri; Sonja Hartnack; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The ability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system to measure cardiac output and track cardiac output changes during one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Katsuaki Tanaka; Tokuhiro Yamada; Tadashi Matsuura; Takashi Mori; Tomoharu Funao; Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.

Authors:  Lisa Sangkum; Geoffrey L Liu; Ling Yu; Hong Yan; Alan D Kaye; Henry Liu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Sheng-Yi Lin; An-Hsun Chou; Yung-Fong Tsai; Su-Wei Chang; Min-Wen Yang; Pei-Chi Ting; Chun-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling Approach to Predict the Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Septic Patients.

Authors:  Christian Radke; Dagmar Horn; Christian Lanckohr; Björn Ellger; Michaela Meyer; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  The Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Sepsis Patients: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Velissaris; Vasilios Karamouzos; Ioanna Kotroni; Charalampos Pierrakos; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-09-29

7.  Comparison of pulmonary artery catheter, echocardiography, and arterial waveform analysis monitoring in predicting the hemodynamic state during and after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Paul Power; Allison Bone; Nicholas Simpson; Cheng-Hon Yap; Simon Gower; Michael Bailey
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Comparison the accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation of FloTrac with the PiCCO device in septic shock patients.

Authors:  Bodin Khwannimit; Rattina Jomsuriya
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.