Literature DB >> 25721853

Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Michael T Ganter1, Jamal A Alhashemi2, Adel M Al-Shabasy2, Ursina M Schmid3, Peter Schott3, Sanaa A Shalabi2, Ahmed M Badri2, Sonja Hartnack4, Christoph K Hofer5.   

Abstract

Septic shock is a serious medical condition. With increased concerns about invasive techniques, a number of non-invasive and semi-invasive devices measuring cardiac output (CO) have become commercially available. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy, precision and trending abilities of the FloTrac and the continuous pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution technique determining CO in septic shock patients. Consecutive septic shock patients were included in two centres and CO was measured every 4 h up to 48 h by FloTrac (APCO) and by pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) using the continuous (CCO) and intermittent (ICO) technique. Forty-seven septic shock patients with 326 matched sets of APCO, CCO and ICO data were available for analysis. Bland and Altman analysis revealed a mean bias ±2 SD of 0.0 ± 2.14 L min(-1) for APCO-ICO (%error = 34.5 %) and 0.23 ± 2.55 L min(-1) for CCO-ICO (%error = 40.4 %). Trend analysis showed a concordance of 85 and 81 % for APCO and CCO, respectively. In contrast to CCO, APCO was influenced by systemic vascular resistance and by mean arterial pressure. In septic shock patients, APCO measurements assessed by FloTrac but also the established CCO measurements using the PAC did not meet the currently accepted statistical criteria indicating acceptable clinical performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output, measurement; Pulmonary artery catheter; Pulse wave analysis; Sepsis; Stroke volume, measurement; Thermodilution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25721853     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9672-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  35 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Pulmonary artery catheters: evolving rates and reasons for use.

Authors:  Karen K Y Koo; Jack C J Sun; Qi Zhou; Gordan Guyatt; Deborah J Cook; Stephen D Walter; Maureen O Meade
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures.

Authors:  P S Myles; J Cui
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Minimally invasive monitoring of cardiac output in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jamal A Alhashemi; Maurizio Cecconi; Giorgio della Rocca; Maxime Cannesson; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2010-09

5.  Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock.

Authors:  Cornelis Slagt; Marcel A de Leeuw; Jan Beute; Emmy Rijnsburger; Martijn Hoeksema; Jan W R Mulder; Ignacio Malagon; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock.

Authors:  Feras Hatib; Jos R C Jansen; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-06-23

Review 7.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice.

Authors:  C W Stetz; R G Miller; G E Kelly; T A Raffin
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-12

Review 9.  Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Simon W Chong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

Authors:  Sujanthy S Rajaram; Nayan K Desai; Ankur Kalra; Mithil Gajera; Susan K Cavanaugh; William Brampton; Duncan Young; Sheila Harvey; Kathy Rowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A Critchley; Steffen Rex; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Sheng-Yi Lin; An-Hsun Chou; Yung-Fong Tsai; Su-Wei Chang; Min-Wen Yang; Pei-Chi Ting; Chun-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Noninvasive pulse contour analysis for determination of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Sebastian Roth; Henrik Fox; Uwe Fuchs; Uwe Schulz; Angelika Costard-Jäckle; Jan F Gummert; Dieter Horstkotte; Olaf Oldenburg; Thomas Bitter
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Agreement between continuous cardiac output measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system and a pulmonary artery catheter in adult liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yutaka Murata; Takumi Imai; Chikashi Takeda; Toshiyuki Mizota; Shuji Kawamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  [Heart in sepsis : Molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapy of septic cardiomyopathy].

Authors:  L Martin; M Derwall; C Thiemermann; T Schürholz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karim Kouz; Frederic Michard; Alina Bergholz; Christina Vokuhl; Luisa Briesenick; Phillip Hoppe; Moritz Flick; Gerhard Schön; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.

Authors:  Masaaki Asamoto; Ryo Orii; Mikiya Otsuji; Masahiko Bougaki; Yousuke Imai; Yoshitsugu Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients: the performance of seven different functional hemodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Martin Geisen; Sonja Hartnack; Omer Dzemali; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Comparison of pulmonary artery catheter, echocardiography, and arterial waveform analysis monitoring in predicting the hemodynamic state during and after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Paul Power; Allison Bone; Nicholas Simpson; Cheng-Hon Yap; Simon Gower; Michael Bailey
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bikia; Theodore G Papaioannou; Stamatia Pagoulatou; Georgios Rovas; Evangelos Oikonomou; Gerasimos Siasos; Dimitris Tousoulis; Nikolaos Stergiopulos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.