Literature DB >> 19059920

Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery.

G Biancofiore1, L A H Critchley, A Lee, L Bindi, M Bisà, M Esposito, L Meacci, R Mozzo, P DeSimone, L Urbani, F Filipponi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pulmonary artery catheter is invasive and may cause serious complications. A safe method of cardiac output (CO) measurement is needed. We have assessed the accuracy and reliability of a recently marketed self-calibrating arterial pulse contour CO monitoring system (FloTrac/Vigileo) in end-stage liver failure patients undergoing liver transplant. The pattern of alterations known as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and the transplant procedure itself, provided an evaluation under varying clinical conditions.
METHODS: The cardiac index was measured simultaneously by thermodilution (CI(TD): mean of four readings) using a pulmonary artery catheter and pulse contour analysis (CI(V): mean value computed by the FloTrac/Vigileo over the same time period). Readings were made at 10 time-points during liver transplant surgery (T1-T5) and on the intensive care unit (T6-T10). CI(V) was computed using the latest Vigileo software version 01.10.
RESULTS: A total of 290 paired readings from 29 patients were collected. Mean (SD) CI(TD) was 5.2 (1.3) and CI(V) was 3.9 (0.9) litre min(-1) m(-2), with a corrected for repeated measures bias between readings of 1.3 (0.2) litre min(-1) m(-2) and 95% limits of agreement of -1.5 (0.2) to 4.1 (0.3) litre min(-1) m(-2). The percentage error (2SD(Bias)/meanCI(TD)) was 54%, which exceeded a 30% limit of acceptance. Low peripheral resistance and increasing bias were related (r=0.69; P<0.001). The Vigileo system failed to reliably trend CI data, with a concordance compared with thermodilution below an acceptable level (at best 68% of sequential readings).
CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with hyperdynamic circulation, the Vigileo system showed a degree of error and unreliability higher than that considered acceptable for clinical purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19059920     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  47 in total

1.  Can the "FloTrac" really track flow in septic patients?

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Daniel Lahner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Agreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution.

Authors:  Matthew Lee; Laurence Weinberg; Brett Pearce; Nicholas Scurrah; David A Story; Param Pillai; Peter R McCall; Larry P McNicol; Philip J Peyton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Jamal A Alhashemi; Adel M Al-Shabasy; Ursina M Schmid; Peter Schott; Sanaa A Shalabi; Ahmed M Badri; Sonja Hartnack; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  The impact of systemic vascular resistance on the accuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery: a prospective observational comparison study.

Authors:  Yohei Sotomi; Katsuomi Iwakura; Yoshiharu Higuchi; Kazuo Abe; Junko Yoshida; Takafumi Masai; Kenshi Fujii
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].

Authors:  U Wittkowski; C Spies; M Sander; J Erb; A Feldheiser; C von Heymann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Raffaella Reineke; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Laura Comotti; Luigi Beretta; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles and practice in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Corrected right ventricular end-diastolic volume and initial distribution volume of glucose correlate with cardiac output after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Junichi Saito; Hironori Ishihara; Eiji Hashiba; Hirobumi Okawa; Tomoyuki Kudo; Masahiro Sawada; Toshihito Tsubo; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Importance of re-calibration time on pulse contour analysis agreement with thermodilution measurements of cardiac output: a retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Christopher G Scully; Shanti Gomatam; Shawn Forrest; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Pitfalls in haemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform.

Authors:  Luigi Camporota; Richard Beale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.