Literature DB >> 2305912

Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

R S Stafford1.   

Abstract

This study assessed the relation between payment source and cesarean section use by analyzing California data on hospital deliveries. Of 461,066 deliveries in 1986, cesarean sections were performed in 24.4 percent. Women with private insurance had the highest cesarean section rates (29.1 percent). Successively lower rates were observed for women covered by non-Kaiser health maintenance organizations (26.8 percent), Medi-Cal (22.9 percent), Kaiser (19.7 percent), self-pay (19.3 percent), and Indigent Services (15.6 percent). Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) occurred more than twice as frequently in women covered by Kaiser (19.9 percent) and Indigent Services (24.8 percent), compared to those with private insurance (8.1 percent). Sizable, although less pronounced, associations between payment source and cesarean section use were noted for the indications of breech presentation, dystocia, and fetal distress. Accounting for maternal age and race/ethnicity did not alter these findings. Variations in the use of cesarean section have a substantial financial impact on health care payors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305912      PMCID: PMC1404683          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.3.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Obstetric and gynecologic operations in the United States, 1979 to 1984.

Authors:  I M Rutkow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Practice mode and payment method. Effects on use, costs, quality, and access.

Authors:  M C Hornbrook; S E Berki
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Paying for maternity care in the United States.

Authors:  R B Gold; A M Kenney; S Singh
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

5.  A comparison of the quality of maternity care between a health-maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices.

Authors:  S Wilner; S C Schoenbaum; R R Monson; R N Winickoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records.

Authors:  R L Williams; P M Chen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Variations in medical care among small areas.

Authors:  J Wennberg; A Gittelsohn
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate.

Authors:  R H de Regt; H L Minkoff; J Feldman; R H Schwarz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Temporal variation in rates of cesarean section for dystocia: does "convenience" play a role?

Authors:  W Fraser; R H Usher; F H McLean; C Bossenberry; M E Thomson; M S Kramer; L P Smith; H Power
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  29 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

3.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Defining reducible risk : Social dimensions of assessing birth technologies.

Authors:  S B Ruzek
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-12

7.  Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.

Authors:  O A Henry; K D Gregory; C J Hobel; L D Platt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Health maintenance organizations, independent practice associations, and cesarean section rates.

Authors:  A D Tussing; M A Wojtowycz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Acute care visits and rehospitalization in women and infants after cesarean birth.

Authors:  D Donahue; D Brooten; M Roncoli; L Arnold; H Knapp; L Borucki; A Cohen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Racial and ethnic differences in indication for primary cesarean delivery at term: experience at one U.S. Institution.

Authors:  Sierra Washington; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.