Literature DB >> 1739159

Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

R Bertollini1, D DiLallo, T Spadea, C Perucci.   

Abstract

The study, based on birth certificate data from 1985 through 1987, investigated cesarean section (CS) rates in the Lazio region of Italy and their relationship with mode of hospital care payment. Use of abdominal delivery increased from 22.3% in 1985 to 24.3% in 1987. CS rates were highest (34.7%) in private hospitals. A marked variation in the use of CS was associated with mode of hospital care payment independently from other predictors of abdominal delivery.

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1739159      PMCID： PMC1694300          DOI： 10.2105/ajph.82.2.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN： 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies.

Authors:  O Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.

Authors:  F C Notzon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  1988 U.S. cesarean-section rate at 24.7 per 100 births--a plateau?

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; M Moien
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  1988 U.S. cesarean-section rate: good news or bad?

Authors:  S A Myers; N Gleicher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records.

Authors:  R L Williams; P M Chen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Modern indications for cesarean section.

Authors:  L I Mann; J Gallant
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-10-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The Green Bay cesarean section study. I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  R K DeMott; H F Sandmire
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308
View more
  14 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  [Differences in the likelihood of caesareans, associated with dependency on hospitals, the volume of cases and the obstetric risk].

Authors:  A Sarría-Santamera; E T López-Madurga
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

4.  The effect of previous cesarean sections on current cesarean rates.

Authors:  A Leyland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in Beirut: assessing predictors in nine hospitals.

Authors:  Hala Tamim; Souheil Y El-Chemaly; Anwar H Nassar; Alia M Aaraj; Oona M R Campbell; Afamia A Kaddour; Khalid A Yunis
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Reporting of quality indicators and improvement in hospital performance: the P.Re.Val.E. Regional Outcome Evaluation Program.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Chiara Sorge; Danilo Fusco; Nera Agabiti; Marina Davoli; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; F Edmonston; M Verdon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Payments and quality of care in private for-profit and public hospitals in Greece.

Authors:  Elias Kondilis; Magda Gavana; Stathis Giannakopoulos; Emmanouil Smyrnakis; Nikolaos Dombros; Alexis Benos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Aoife Brick; Richard Layte; Anne Nolan; Michael J Turner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Effect of Social Factors on Cesarean Birth in Primiparous Women: A Cross Sectional Study (Social Factors and Cesarean Birth).

Authors:  Can Oner; Binali Catak; Sevinç Sütlü; Selçuk Kilinç
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.429
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.