Literature DB >> 6472401

Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

G M Anderson, J Lomas.   

Abstract

We analyzed the records of 454,668 births in Ontario in the years 1979 to 1982 and found that the cesarean birth rate increased from 16.5 per hundred deliveries in 1979 to 18.7 in 1982. Cesarean births were classified according to four indications: previous cesarean birth, breech presentation, dystocia, and fetal distress. The increase in the cesarean rate for each indication from 1979 to 1982 was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the total rate increase. Previous cesarean births accounted for 68 per cent of the increase, breech presentation for 14 per cent, dystocia for 4 per cent, and fetal distress for 14 per cent. The impact of previous cesarean births was indicated by an increase in the number of women presenting with this indication--from 5.8 to 7.8 per cent of all deliveries. Although the incidence of breech presentation remained stable, the cesarean birth rate increased from 54.8 to 65 per cent for this indication. There were no marked changes in either the incidence of or cesarean rates for dystocia. The incidence of fetal distress doubled (2.4 to 4.7 per cent of deliveries), but the rate of cesarean births in these cases fell from 50.5 to 32.7 per cent. These findings suggest that physicians may have begun to respond to rising professional and public concern over the increasing cesarean birth rate, but major advances in controlling this rate can be achieved only by addressing the question of vaginal deliveries for some patients who have previously had cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6472401     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198410043111405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  30 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-25

3.  Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Unnecessary surgery.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  W W Cai; J S Marks; C H Chen; Y X Zhuang; L Morris; J R Harris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Cultural implications of differing rates of medically indicated and elective cesarean deliveries for foreign-born versus native-born taiwanese mothers.

Authors:  Chun-Che Huang; Chung-Yi Li; Chiang-Hsing Yang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-07

9.  Periodic health examination, 1989 update: 4. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring and prevention of neonatal herpes simplex. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.