Literature DB >> 15782508

Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Darren Grant1.   

Abstract

The difference in the risk-adjusted cesarean rates of mothers who are and who are not privately insured is divided into components attributable to the following four factors: the practice style of the physician attending the birth, the closeness of the physician-mother relationship, individual nonclinical factors, and the direct influence of private insurance on the physician's treatment decision. Estimates from two expansive, complementary data sets indicate that the most of the differential is attributable to the first two factors, particularly the pairing of privately insured mothers with physicians who are inclined to perform cesareans. There is some evidence that these pairings are not incidental but the result of firm (and possibly consumer) choices.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15782508     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-005-5212-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  40 in total

1.  Primary cesarean section rates in uninsured, Medicaid and insured populations of predominantly rural northern New England.

Authors:  D K Onion; D L Meyer; D E Wennberg; D N Soule
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Consumer satisfaction and supplier induced demand.

Authors:  F Carlsen; J Grytten
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Physician financial incentives and cesarean section delivery.

Authors:  J Gruber; M Owings
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  1996

4.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Race and cesarean delivery in Florida.

Authors:  D Grant
Journal:  Rev Black Polit Econ       Date:  2000

6.  Why is the cesarean delivery rate so high in Alabama? An examination of risk factors, 1991-1993.

Authors:  L A Woolbright
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

Authors:  E B Keeler; M Brodie
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  G L Goyert; S F Bottoms; M C Treadwell; P C Nehra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Physicians as patients--the use of obstetric technology in physician families.

Authors:  C E Dugowson; S K Holland
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-04

10.  The effect of health coverage for uninsured pregnant women on maternal health and the use of cesarean section.

Authors:  J S Haas; S Udvarhelyi; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

2.  Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Malini Anand Nijagal; Miriam Kuppermann; Sanae Nakagawa; Yvonne Cheng
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Association between Maternal Mortality and Cesarean Section: Turkey Experience.

Authors:  Cihangir Uzuncakmak; Hasene Ozcam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Xhyljeta Luta; Kali Tal; David C Goodman; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Medina Braha; David C Goodman; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Participation in the state led 'Janani Sahayogi Yojana' public private partnership program to promote facility births in Madhya Pradesh, India: views from private obstetrician partners.

Authors:  Vishal Diwan; Sudhir Chandra Joshi; Kate Jehan; Ayesha De Costa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Alban Fejza; Mrika Aliu; Peter Jüni; David C Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.