Literature DB >> 3605474

Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

S M Taffel, P J Placek, T Liss.   

Abstract

The rate of cesarean section delivery in the United States rose from 4.5 per 100 deliveries in 1965 to 22.7 in 1985, and in 1985 an estimated 851,000 live births were cesarean deliveries, according to data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This increase has been observed for all ages, and within all regions of the country. The rate for teenagers and mothers aged 20 to 29 was five to six times as high in 1985 as in 1965, and four times as high for mothers aged 30 years and older. Repeat cesareans account for an increasing share of all cesarean deliveries; in 1985 one in three cesareans were repeats. The increase in the cesarean rate of 6.2 percentage points between 1980 and 1985 (from 16.5 to 22.7) was partitioned according to five complications of delivery recorded on hospital discharge records: previous cesarean delivery, breech presentation, dystocia, fetal distress, and all other complications. Nearly half (48 per cent) of the increase was associated with previous cesarean delivery, 29 per cent with dystocia, 16 per cent with fetal distress, 5 per cent with breech presentation, and 2 per cent with all other complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3605474      PMCID: PMC1647267          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

1.  Comparisons of national cesarean-section rates.

Authors:  F C Notzon; P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Has use of cesarean section reduced the risks of delivery in the preterm breech presentation?

Authors:  B Bodmer; A Benjamin; F H McLean; R H Usher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  One-fifth of 1983 US births by cesarean section.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cesarean section delivery rates: United States, 1981.

Authors:  P J Placek; S Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Effect of fetal monitoring on cesarean section rates.

Authors:  R R Neutra; S Greenland; E A Friedman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.

Authors:  P J Placek; K G Keppel; S M Taffel; T L Liss
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth.

Authors:  R H Paul; J P Phelan; S Y Yeh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced in incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death?

Authors:  J E Green; F McLean; L P Smith; R Usher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section.

Authors:  B S Merrill; C E Gibbs
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience.

Authors:  P R Meier; R P Porreco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  38 in total

1.  Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

2.  Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): The psychological sequelae of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP).

Authors:  Isabel D Tol; Michael Yousif; Sally L Collins
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Admission for Delivery in Women With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Robert M Hayward; Elyse Foster; Zian H Tseng
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Epidemic diarrhea of the newborn, a nosocomial problem in developing countries.

Authors:  A Yankauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Defining reducible risk : Social dimensions of assessing birth technologies.

Authors:  S B Ruzek
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-12

8.  Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  1986 C-sections rise; VBACs inch upward.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Anesthesia for cesarean delivery and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Juraj Sprung; Randall P Flick; Robert T Wilder; Slavica K Katusic; Tasha L Pike; Mariella Dingli; Stephen J Gleich; Darrell R Schroeder; William J Barbaresi; Andrew C Hanson; David O Warner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.