Literature DB >> 6869639

Controlling the rise in cesarean section rates by the dissemination of information from vital records.

R L Williams, P M Chen.   

Abstract

The recent rapid increase in cesarean childbirth is a source of growing public health concern. We suggest that one method of ameliorating the rise would be to disseminate hospital-specific cesarean section rates. To make such rates comparable between hospitals, it is necessary to adjust for variations in maternal and newborn factors associated with cesarean section. We therefore applied an indirect standardization technique to three years of California vital records data. The results show sizable variations in cesarean section rates among individual hospitals and by hospital type, both before and after standardization. For such a method to be effective, complete and accurate information from birth certificates is an obvious prerequisite.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6869639      PMCID: PMC1651116          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.73.8.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  California's new birth certificate law: a model for the nation?

Authors:  A C Hexter; W Winkelstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Identifying the sources of the recent decline in perinatal mortality rates in California.

Authors:  R L Williams; P M Chen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  In-hospital maternal mortality in the United States: time trends and relation to method of delivery.

Authors:  D B Petitti; R C Cefalo; S Shapiro; P Whalley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Variations in medical care among small areas.

Authors:  J Wennberg; A Gittelsohn
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975.

Authors:  D Petitti; R O Olson; R L Williams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

2.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

5.  Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.

Authors:  R Holubkov; V L Holt; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  To section or not to section.

Authors:  W H Pearse
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Predictors of cesarean section delivery among college-educated black and white women, Davidson County, Tennessee, 1990-1994.

Authors:  A O Scott-Wright; T M Flanagan; R M Wrona
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

9.  Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.

Authors:  L McKenzie; P A Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.