Literature DB >> 7625515

Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.

O A Henry1, K D Gregory, C J Hobel, L D Platt.   

Abstract

Aggregate databases are increasingly being used to evaluate appropriateness of care, and, for cesarean sections, Anderson and Lomas' International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), coding hierarchy is a widely used tool. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the hierarchy and expand its applicability to repeat cesareans. Hospital records of 1885 singleton cesareans were reviewed. Clinical indications and ICD-9 hierarchical codes were concordant for 83% of primary and 86% of repeat cesareans; modification allowed elective repeat cesareans to be distinguished from indicated procedures. The Anderson and Lomas ICD-9 hierarchy is a valid tool for assessing indications for cesarean. The current modification improves its clinical utility and expands its application to repeat procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7625515      PMCID: PMC1615835          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.

Authors:  F C Notzon; S Cnattingius; P Bergsjø; S Cole; S Taffel; L Irgens; A K Daltveit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?

Authors:  K D Gregory; O A Henry; A J Gellens; C J Hobel; L D Platt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  D E King; K Lahiri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  29 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  [Differences in the likelihood of caesareans, associated with dependency on hospitals, the volume of cases and the obstetric risk].

Authors:  A Sarría-Santamera; E T López-Madurga
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  The impact of health information technology adoption by outpatient facilities on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Mary E Deily; Tianyan Hu; Sabrina Terrizzi; Shin-Yi Chou; Chad D Meyerhoefer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Primary cesarean deliveries prior to labor in the United States, 1979-2004.

Authors:  Jutta M Joesch; Ginger L Gossman; Koray Tanfer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-07-24

7.  Cultural implications of differing rates of medically indicated and elective cesarean deliveries for foreign-born versus native-born taiwanese mothers.

Authors:  Chun-Che Huang; Chung-Yi Li; Chiang-Hsing Yang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-07

8.  The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Meghana Limaye; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Brief Report: Cesarean Delivery and Subsequent Fecundability.

Authors:  Rose G Radin; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; Henrik T Sorensen; Anders H Riis; Wendy Kuohung; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Fiona Bragg; David A Cromwell; Leroy C Edozien; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Tahir A Mahmood; Allan Templeton; Jan H van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.