Literature DB >> 3736601

Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate.

R H de Regt, H L Minkoff, J Feldman, R H Schwarz.   

Abstract

The rising rate of cesarean births in the United States has been the focus of academic attention as well as attention from the media during the past decade. Although there is a consensus about the indications for cesarean delivery that have led to the increased rate (dystocia, malpresentation, fetal distress, and previous cesarean delivery), the influence of other key factors, such as whether the patient received care from a private physician or through a hospital clinic, has not been established. In a review of 65,647 deliveries in four Brooklyn hospitals between 1977 and 1982, we found that private physicians performed significantly more cesarean sections than house officers and attending physicians. Private patients giving birth to their first child were significantly more likely than clinic patients to undergo cesarean delivery if dystocia, malpresentation, or fetal distress was diagnosed, and private patients with one or more previous deliveries were significantly more likely to undergo cesarean delivery if dystocia or malpresentation was diagnosed. Private patients had fewer perinatal deaths, which were concentrated among infants with birth weights under 2000 g, but the infants of private patients had a significantly higher rate of low Apgar scores and birth injuries than the infants of clinic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3736601     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  25 in total

1.  The effect of income pooling within a call group on rates of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  E S Bland; L W Oppenheimer; P Holmes; S W Wen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

3.  Rethinking "woman's choice" of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Chia-Nien Liu; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Factors affecting perinatal mortality in an urban center.

Authors:  R A Nimmo; G A Murphy; A Adhate; V Ganesh; S White-Walker; L Iffy
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

6.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Anxiety and childbirth.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Who Should be Doing Obstetrics in the 1990s?

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.