Literature DB >> 11297186

Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

W J Hueston1, S Lewis-Stevenson.   

Abstract

Cesarean section rates vary among states from approximately 15% to over 26% of all deliveries. Since it is unlikely that patient factors alone contribute to this wide variation, other non-clinical factors that are unique to each state must influence cesarean section decisions. To explore if provider workforce and specialty was associated with differences in statewide cesarean rates, we compared statewide cesarean rates for 1996 with (1) the volume of deliveries in a state per board-certified obstetrician; (2) percentage of deliveries performed in the state by nurse midwives, and (3) the percentage of family physicians in the state performing obstetrics. In a linear regression model that adjusted for state rurality and median income, we found that only the percentage of family physicians participating in obstetrics was related to cesarean delivery rates. As the percentage of family physicians offering obstetric services increased in a state, the rate of cesarean delivery for that state declined. This effect appeared to be independent of other provider effects, state rurality, or statewide income. Family physician participation in obstetrics is unlikely to be the cause for lower cesarean rates, but is likely a marker for a medical environment and practice style that supports non-operative obstetric care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11297186     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026580929659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  40 in total

1.  Cesarean section rate: a comparison between family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  J A Applegate; M F Walhout
Journal:  Fam Pract Res J       Date:  1992-09

2.  Family practice obstetrics in Michigan. Factors affecting physician participation.

Authors:  M A Smith; L A Green; T L Schwenk
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Site-to-site variation in the factors affecting cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1995-04

4.  Rates of cesarean delivery--United States, 1991.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1993-04-23       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Specialty bias in obstetric care for high-risk socioeconomic groups in Maine.

Authors:  D K Onion; A M Mockapetris
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Differences in the obstetric practices of obstetricians and family physicians in Washington State.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; L G Hart; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Meeting the challenge of the rising cesarean birth rate.

Authors:  R P Porreco
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section.

Authors:  J Butler; B Abrams; J Parker; J M Roberts; R K Laros
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  G L Goyert; S F Bottoms; M C Treadwell; P C Nehra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Does cesarean delivery prevent cerebral palsy or other neurologic problems of childhood?

Authors:  J M Scheller; K B Nelson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.