Literature DB >> 30230989

Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Samira Anderson1, Robert Ellis1, Julie Mehta1, Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

The effects of aging and stimulus configuration on binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) were measured behaviorally and electrophysiologically, using the frequency-following response (FFR) to target brainstem/midbrain encoding. The tests were performed in 15 younger normal-hearing (<30 yr) and 15 older normal-hearing (>60 yr) participants. The stimuli consisted of a 500-Hz target tone embedded in a narrowband (50-Hz bandwidth) or wideband (1,500-Hz bandwidth) noise masker. The interaural phase conditions included NoSo (tone and noise presented interaurally in-phase), NoSπ (noise presented interaurally in-phase and tone presented out-of-phase), and NπSo (noise presented interaurally out-of-phase and tone presented in-phase) configurations. In the behavioral experiment, aging reduced the magnitude of the BMLD. The magnitude of the BMLD was smaller for the NoSo-NπSo threshold difference compared with the NoSo-NoSπ threshold difference, and it was also smaller in narrowband compared with wideband conditions, consistent with previous measurements. In the electrophysiology experiment, older participants had reduced FFR magnitudes and smaller differences between configurations. There were significant changes in FFR magnitude between the NoSo to NoSπ configurations but not between the NoSo to NπSo configurations. The age-related reduction in FFR magnitudes suggests a temporal processing deficit, but no correlation was found between FFR magnitudes and behavioral BMLDs. Therefore, independent mechanisms may be contributing to the behavioral and neural deficits. Specifically, older participants had higher behavioral thresholds than younger participants for the NoSπ and NπSo configurations but had equivalent thresholds for the NoSo configuration. However, FFR magnitudes were reduced in older participants across all configurations. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Behavioral and electrophysiological testing reveal an aging effect for stimuli presented in wideband and narrowband noise conditions, such that behavioral binaural masking level differences and subcortical spectral magnitudes are reduced in older compared with younger participants. These deficits in binaural processing may limit the older participant's ability to use spatial cues to understand speech in environments containing competing sound sources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; binaural masking level difference; frequency-following response; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30230989      PMCID: PMC6337034          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00255.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  57 in total

1.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural and cochlear disparities.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram Van de Sande; Dries H Louage; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?

Authors:  Ieda Maria Ishida; David R Stapells
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: evidence for the locus of brainstem sources.

Authors:  J C Smith; J T Marsh; W S Brown
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-11

7.  Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.

Authors:  Emily B J Coffey; Gabriella Musacchia; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  J W Hall; R S Tyler; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

9.  Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; David W Purcell; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-02

10.  Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently.

Authors:  F Marmel; D Linley; R P Carlyon; H E Gockel; K Hopkins; C J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-13
View more
  7 in total

1.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

2.  Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Kyle Easter; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 5.  Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Age-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.