Literature DB >> 16838540

Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects.

Matthew J Goupell1, William M Hartmann.   

Abstract

One-hundred left-right noise-pairs were generated, all with a fixed value of long-term interaural coherence, 0.9922. The noises had a center frequency of 500 Hz, a bandwidth of 14 Hz, and a duration of 500 ms. Listeners were required to discriminate between these slightly incoherent noises and diotic noises, with a coherence of 1.0. It was found that the value of interaural coherence itself was an inadequate predictor of discrimination. Instead, incoherence was much more readily detected for those noise-pairs with the largest fluctuations in interaural phase or level differences (as measured by the standard deviations). One-hundred noise-pairs with the same value of coherence, 0.9922, and geometric mean frequency of 500 Hz were also generated for bandwidths of 108 and 2394 Hz. It was found that for increasing bandwidth, fluctuations in interaural differences varied less between different noise-pairs and that detection performance varied less as well. The results suggest that incoherence detection is based on the size of interaural fluctuations and that the value of coherence itself predicts performance only in the wideband limit.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838540     DOI: 10.1121/1.2200147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. IV. The effect of compression on stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Processing temporal modulations in binaural and monaural auditory stimuli by neurons in the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Jason M Roberts; Shigeyuki Kuwada; Duck O Kim; Blagoje Filipovic
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-09

6.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

7.  Generating partially correlated noise--a comparison of methods.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Yun Jin Cho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.