Literature DB >> 25234891

Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.

Junwen Mao1, Laurel H Carney2.   

Abstract

The addition of out-of-phase tones to in-phase noises results in dynamic interaural level difference (ILD) and interaural time difference (ITD) cues for the dichotic tone-in-noise detection task. Several models have been used to predict listeners' detection performance based on ILD, ITD, or different combinations of the two cues. The models can be tested using detection performance from an ensemble of reproducible-noise maskers. Previous models cannot predict listeners' detection performance for reproducible-noise maskers without fitting the data. Here, two models were tested for narrowband and wideband reproducible-noise experiments. One model was a linear combination of ILD and ITD that included the generally ignored correlation between the two cues. The other model was based on a newly proposed cue, the slope of the interaural envelope difference (SIED). Predictions from both models explained a significant portion of listeners' performance for detection of a 500-Hz tone in wideband noise. Predictions based on the SIED approached the predictable variance in the wideband condition. The SIED represented a nonlinear combination of ILD and ITD, with the latter cue dominating. Listeners did not use a common strategy (cue) to detect tones in the narrowband condition and may use different single frequencies or different combinations of frequency channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234891      PMCID: PMC3985905          DOI: 10.1121/1.4861848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.

Authors:  J F Culling; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: I. Results for human.

Authors:  Mary E Evilsizer; Robert H Gilkey; Christine R Mason; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effect of interaural phase on frequency and amplitude discrimination.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On cochlear encoding: potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique.

Authors:  E de Boer; H R de Jongh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation.

Authors:  D W Grantham; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Explanation of masking-level differences that result from interaural intensive disparities of noise.

Authors:  T R Dolan; D E Robinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: II. Results for rabbit.

Authors:  Ling Zheng; Susan J Early; Christine R Mason; Fabio Idrobo; J Michael Harrison; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mary E Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Tone-in-noise detection using envelope cues: comparison of signal-processing-based and physiological models.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  A hemispheric two-channel code accounts for binaural unmasking in humans.

Authors:  Jörg Encke; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-10-22

5.  Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Guangxin Hu; Sarah C Determan; Yue Dong; Alec T Beeve; Joshua E Collins; Yan Gai
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22

6.  Auditory Brainstem Models: Adapting Cochlear Nuclei Improve Spatial Encoding by the Medial Superior Olive in Reverberation.

Authors:  Andrew Brughera; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; Mathias Dietz; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.