Literature DB >> 22933529

Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis.

H Devlin1, J Yuan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to investigate how image magnification and distortion in dental panoramic radiography are influenced by object size and position for a small round object such as a ball bearing used for calibration.
METHODS: Two ball bearings (2.5 mm and 6 mm in diameter) were placed at approximately the same position between the teeth of a plastic skull and radiographed 21 times. The skull was replaced each time. Their images were measured by software using edge detection and ellipse-fitting algorithms. Using a standard definition of magnification, equations were derived to enable an object's magnification to be determined from its position and vice versa knowing the diameter and machine parameters.
RESULTS: The average magnification of the 2.5 mm ball bearing was 1.292 (0.0445) horizontally and 1.257 (0.0067) vertically with a mean ratio of 1.028 (0.0322); standard deviations are in parentheses. The figures for the 6 mm ball bearing were 1.286 (0.0068), 1.255 (0.0018) and 1.025 (0.0061), respectively. Derived positions of each ball bearing from magnification were more consistent horizontally than vertically. There was less variation in either direction for the 6 mm ball bearing than the 2.5 mm one.
CONCLUSIONS: Automatic measurement of image size resulted in less variation in vertical magnification values than horizontal. There are only certain positions in the focal trough that achieve zero distortion. Object location can be determined from its diameter, measured magnification and machine parameters. The 6 mm diameter ball bearing is preferable to the 2.5 mm one for more reliable magnification measurement and position determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22933529      PMCID: PMC3729190          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/29951683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  19 in total

1.  Area-dependent enlargement ratios of panoramic tomography on orthograde patient positioning and its significance for implant dentistry.

Authors:  G Gomez-Roman; D Lukas; R Beniashvili; W Schulte
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment.

Authors:  C E Sakakura; J A N D Morais; L C M Loffredo; G Scaf
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.

Authors:  Lydia Vazquez; Nikola Saulacic; Urs Belser; Jean-Pierre Bernard
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice.

Authors:  Jun-Beom Park
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  Reliability of the vertical magnification factor on panoramic radiographs: clinical implications for posterior mandibular implants.

Authors:  Lydia Vazquez; Yassin Nizam Al Din; Urs Christoph Belser; Christophe Combescure; Jean-Pierre Bernard
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Characteristics of the Orthopantomograph OP 100.

Authors:  W C Scarfe; F E Eraso; A G Farman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Fine structure of the Panorex image.

Authors:  M L Freedman; S R Matteson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1977-04

8.  A mathematical model of narrow beam rotation methods.

Authors:  U Welander
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1974-05

9.  Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. IV. Object morphology; outer contours.

Authors:  G Tronje; U Welander; W D McDavid; C R Morris
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1981

10.  The role of the dental surgeon in detecting osteoporosis: the OSTEODENT study.

Authors:  H Devlin; P Allen; J Graham; R Jacobs; K Nicopoulou-Karayianni; C Lindh; E Marjanovic; J Adams; S Pavitt; P van der Stelt; K Horner
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  25 in total

1.  The evaluation of MCI, MI, PMI and GT on both genders with different age and dental status.

Authors:  G Bozdag; S Sener
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Study of edge detection task in dental panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  L Gráfová; M Kasparová; S Kakawand; A Procházka; T Dostálová
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Impact of malpositioning on panoramic radiography in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Björn Riecke; Reinhard E Friedrich; Dirk Schulze; Clemens Loos; Marco Blessmann; Max Heiland; Johannes Wikner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Obstacles in spatial evaluation of CBCT-reformatted panoramic imaging.

Authors:  Johannes Wikner; Reinhard E Friedrich; Ashkan Rashad; Dirk Schulze; Henning Hanken; Max Heiland; Alexander Gröbe; Björn Riecke
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Descriptive study of mandibular canal visibility: morphometric and densitometric analysis for digital panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Marius Kubilius; Ričardas Kubilius; Vaidas Varinauskas; Rimantas Žalinkevičius; Tolga F Tözüm; Gintaras Juodžbalys
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Root proximity of miniscrews at a variety of maxillary and mandibular buccal sites: Reliability of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Jae-Hwa An; Yong-Il Kim; Seong-Sik Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Woo-Sung Son; Sung-Hun Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Calculation of postoperative bone healing of cystic lesions of the jaw-a retrospective study.

Authors:  Christoph Sacher; Daniel Holzinger; Paul Grogger; Florian Wagner; Gregor Sperl; Rudolf Seemann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Comparison of methods for localization of impacted maxillary canines by panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  S An; J Wang; J Li; Q Cheng; C-M Jiang; Y-T Wang; Y-F Huang; W-J Yu; Y-C Gou; L Xiao
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Severe secondary hyperparathyroidism and panoramic radiography parameters.

Authors:  João César Guimarães Henriques; Julio Cezar de Melo Castilho; Reinhilde Jacobs; José Benedito Oliveira Amorim; Rafaela Rangel Rosa; Caio Vinícius Bardi Matai
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: A review.

Authors:  Rafael Henrique Nunes Rondon; Yamba Carla Lara Pereira; Glauce Crivelaro do Nascimento
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.