Literature DB >> 30855184

Root proximity of miniscrews at a variety of maxillary and mandibular buccal sites: Reliability of panoramic radiography.

Jae-Hwa An, Yong-Il Kim, Seong-Sik Kim, Soo-Byung Park, Woo-Sung Son, Sung-Hun Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the root proximity and the insertion angles of miniscrews after miniscrew placement at a variety of maxillary and mandibular buccal sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to determine the differences in root proximity between CBCT and panoramic radiography (PR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients (mean age, 22.0 ± 4.5 years) who underwent postoperative CBCT and PR after miniscrew placements for intermaxillary fixation in orthognathic surgery. Twelve miniscrews were placed in the buccal bone of each patient: at sites between the central incisor and lateral incisor (SII), sites between the canine and first premolar (SCP), and sites between the second premolar and first molar (SPM) on the right and left sides of the mandible and maxilla. The insertion angles were measured on CBCT, and the root proximity was assessed on CBCT and PR.
RESULTS: The mean vertical placement angles ranged from 84.27° to 95.12°, and the mean horizontal placement angles ranged from 90.93° to 101.1°. The rates of no contact between the root and the miniscrew were 68.0% in the SII, 50.5% in the SCP, and 57.8% in the SPM, which were significantly different (P = .000). The total concordance rate between PR and CBCT was 41.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should use extreme caution during placement of miniscrews in the SCP. There are limitations on the use of PR for evaluating the root proximity of miniscrews.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthodontic miniscrew; Panoramic radiography; Root proximity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30855184      PMCID: PMC8117195          DOI: 10.2319/100318-713.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  17 in total

Review 1.  Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Mitsuru Motoyoshi
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.556

2.  Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure?

Authors:  Seong-Hun Kim; Seok-Man Kang; Yong-Suk Choi; Yoon-Ah Kook; Kyu-Rhim Chung; John C Huang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Mitsuru Motoyoshi; Tohru Yoshida; Akiko Ono; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Shingo Kuroda; Kazuyo Yamada; Toru Deguchi; Takashi Hashimoto; Hee-Moon Kyung; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc Schätzle; Roland Männchen; Marcel Zwahlen; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  R Kanomi
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1997-11

7.  Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density.

Authors:  H Watanabe; T Deguchi; M Hasegawa; M Ito; S Kim; T Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles.

Authors:  T A Larheim; D B Svanaes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Cristiane Monnerat; Luciana Restle; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic micro-implants using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kyung-Inn Min; Sang-Cheol Kim; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Jin-Hyoung Cho; Eon-Hwa Lee; Na-Young Chang; Jong-Moon Chae
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?

Authors:  Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Danieli M Brasil; Laís A Forner; Cassiana Viccari; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Q Freitas; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Two-dimensional radiographs versus cone-beam computed tomography in planning mini-implant placement: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela-Franco-da Rosa Caetano; Mariana-Quirino-Silveira Soares; Luciana-Butini Oliveira; José-Luiz-Cintra Junqueira; Monikelly-do Carmo-Chagas Nascimento
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.