Jun-Beom Park1. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, 428 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. jbassoonis@yahoo.co.kr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted 1/ to find out the effects of anatomical sites and implant types on the magnification and 2/ to evaluate the inter-observer variability on the evaluation using the digital panoramas taken at daily practices. STUDY DESIGN: Panoramic radiographs from 156 patients treated with implants were evaluated by three observers. The length was measured on the lateral aspect of the implant in 1:1 mode using image measurement program and the percent magnification was calculated. The inter-observer correlation coefficient was measured to express inter-observer variability using reliability analysis-scale. RESULTS: The average magnification factor in the panoramic radiograph was 126.8 % in the vertical plane. Location within the anatomic arch showed different magnification by a minimum of 119.4 to a maximum of 130.8 %. The measurements among three examiners were well correlated showing correlation coefficient of 0.81. The differences between one side from the contralateral side was evaluated and it was shown that the differences were observed only seen maxillary anterior and upper premolar regions. Additionally, the external non-submerged group had the highest magnification value. CONCLUSIONS: Digital panoramic radiographs showed sufficient accuracy and good inter-examiner agreement. The radiographic magnification of implant length was influenced by anatomical sites and implant types.
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted 1/ to find out the effects of anatomical sites and implant types on the magnification and 2/ to evaluate the inter-observer variability on the evaluation using the digital panoramas taken at daily practices. STUDY DESIGN: Panoramic radiographs from 156 patients treated with implants were evaluated by three observers. The length was measured on the lateral aspect of the implant in 1:1 mode using image measurement program and the percent magnification was calculated. The inter-observer correlation coefficient was measured to express inter-observer variability using reliability analysis-scale. RESULTS: The average magnification factor in the panoramic radiograph was 126.8 % in the vertical plane. Location within the anatomic arch showed different magnification by a minimum of 119.4 to a maximum of 130.8 %. The measurements among three examiners were well correlated showing correlation coefficient of 0.81. The differences between one side from the contralateral side was evaluated and it was shown that the differences were observed only seen maxillary anterior and upper premolar regions. Additionally, the external non-submerged group had the highest magnification value. CONCLUSIONS: Digital panoramic radiographs showed sufficient accuracy and good inter-examiner agreement. The radiographic magnification of implant length was influenced by anatomical sites and implant types.
Authors: L Vazquez; Y Nizamaldin; C Combescure; R Nedir; M Bischof; D M Dohan Ehrenfest; J-P Carrel; U C Belser Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.419