Literature DB >> 21435009

Reliability of the vertical magnification factor on panoramic radiographs: clinical implications for posterior mandibular implants.

Lydia Vazquez1, Yassin Nizam Al Din, Urs Christoph Belser, Christophe Combescure, Jean-Pierre Bernard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Panoramic radiographs allow evaluation of the available bone height for implant treatment planning while imparting a low radiation dose. As panoramic radiography produces image distortion, reference objects are required to determine the exact magnification. This study aims to estimate a panoramic unit's vertical magnification factor (MF) by measuring the length of dental implants used as radiopaque reference objects on postoperative panoramic radiographs. We compared our findings to the vertical MF listed by the panoramic unit manufacturer, and studied the reproducibility and accuracy of our measuring method by analyzing the inter- and intraobserver agreements.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a digital calliper, we measured the length of 32 implants on 17 postoperative panoramic radiographs taken with a Scanora unit. The implants were 10mm-long standard Straumann implants placed in the posterior segments of mandibles. The MF was calculated by dividing the implant's radiological length by the implant's real length.
RESULTS: The mean calculated vertical MF was 1.27 ± 0.01 (1.245-1.295) and was lower than the manufacturer's MF (1.3). The vertical MF was 1.28 ± 0.01 in the premolar and 1.27 ± 0.01 in the molar regions. There was an excellent intraobserver reliability (0.96 for observer 1; 0.93 for observer 2) and a good interobserver reliability (0.85 at measurement session 1; 0.8 at measurement session 2)
CONCLUSIONS: The observed reliability of the MF confirms that a panoramic radiograph can be used for preoperative implant length evaluation in the posterior mandibular segments. MF stability should be verified with other panoramic units. In clinical practice, using the implant length as a reference object on postoperative panoramic radiographs is a simple and effective evaluation method to estimate a panoramic unit's MF.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435009     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02131.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  H Devlin; J Yuan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.

Authors:  L Vazquez; Y Nizamaldin; C Combescure; R Nedir; M Bischof; D M Dohan Ehrenfest; J-P Carrel; U C Belser
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Impact of malpositioning on panoramic radiography in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Björn Riecke; Reinhard E Friedrich; Dirk Schulze; Clemens Loos; Marco Blessmann; Max Heiland; Johannes Wikner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Accuracy of computerized vertical measurements on digital orthopantomographs: posterior mandibular region.

Authors:  Mohammad Assaf; Alaa' Z Abu Gharbyah
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-12-31

6.  Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment.

Authors:  Rayyan Abdulhamid Kayal
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hakan Bilhan; Onur Geckili; Selda Arat Bilhan; Fatih Aycicek; Berkman Albayrak; Pelin Bozbulut; Fatma Unalan
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-01-31

8.  Accuracy of linear vertical measurements in posterior mandible on panoramic view.

Authors:  Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar; Pegah Bronoosh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-03

9.  Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Jorge Noriega; Carmen Castro; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Impact of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy.

Authors:  Marc El Hage; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Christophe Combescure; Lydia Vazquez
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.