Literature DB >> 17956572

Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.

Lydia Vazquez1, Nikola Saulacic, Urs Belser, Jean-Pierre Bernard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Various imaging techniques, including conventional radiography and computed tomography, are proposed to localize the mandibular canal prior to implant surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of altered mental nerve sensation after implant placement in the posterior segment of the mandible when a panoramic radiograph is the only preoperative imaging technique used.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 1527 partially and totally edentulous patients who had consecutively received 2584 implants in the posterior segment of the mandible. Preoperative bone height was evaluated from the top of the alveolar crest to the superior border of the mandibular canal on a standard panoramic radiograph. A graduated implant scale from the implant manufacturer was used and 2 mm were subtracted as a safety margin to determine the length of the implant to be inserted.
RESULTS: No permanent sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve were observed. There were two cases of postoperative paresthesia, representing 2/2584 (0.08%) of implants inserted in the posterior segment of the mandible or 2/1527 (0.13%) of patients. These sensory disturbances were minor, lasted for 3 and 6 weeks and resolved spontaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: Panoramic examination can be considered a safe preoperative evaluation procedure for routine posterior mandibular implant placement. Panoramic radiography is a quick, simple, low-cost and low-dose presurgical diagnostic tool. When a safety margin of at least 2 mm above the mandibular canal is respected, panoramic radiography appears to be sufficient to evaluate available bone height prior to insertion of posterior mandibular implants; cross-sectional imaging techniques may not be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17956572     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01402.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  37 in total

1.  The effects of location of alveolar crest on the vertical bone heights on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  S-M Lee; S-S Lee; K-H Huh; W-J Yi; M-S Heo; S-C Choi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  D B S Ladeira; A D Cruz; S M Almeida; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.

Authors:  S Panmekiate; W Apinhasmit; A Petersson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.

Authors:  A M Shelley; A-M Glenny; M Goodwin; P Brunton; K Horner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations.

Authors:  C Tomasi; E Bressan; B Corazza; S Mazzoleni; E Stellini; A Lith
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.

Authors:  Y-K Kim; J-Y Park; S-G Kim; J-S Kim; J-D Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Measurement of the Interantral Bone in Implant Dentistry Using Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Human Radiographic Study.

Authors:  D Kopecka; A Simunek; J Streblov; R Slezak; L Capek
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 0.171

8.  Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.

Authors:  João Henrique Fortes; Christiano de Oliveira-Santos; Wilson Matsumoto; Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta; Camila Tirapelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Object position and image magnification in dental panoramic radiography: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  H Devlin; J Yuan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.

Authors:  L Vazquez; Y Nizamaldin; C Combescure; R Nedir; M Bischof; D M Dohan Ehrenfest; J-P Carrel; U C Belser
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.