Literature DB >> 22915471

An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts.

Christopher B Knowlton1, Markus A Wimmer.   

Abstract

Wear of the polyethylene tibial component is a major factor in the success of total knee replacements. However, sampling resolution and the challenges of estimating original surfaces with relatively complex articulating geometries have limited the accuracy of volumetric measurements of wear on surgically retrieved inserts. A mathematical model analyzed volume error due to sampling resolution and found that 100 × 100 μm(2) point spacing reduced error below 1 mm(3). Small volumes of material were progressively removed from the topside of three unworn tibial inserts, after which each component was weighed and digitized with a laser coordinate measuring machine. Six inserts worn in knee simulator tests and nine surgically retrieved inserts visually scored for damage were also digitized. For these tests, the original surface of an insert was mathematically reconstructed from unworn regions of the same component, and volume loss and its spatial distribution were calculated. Volume loss estimated by autonomous reconstruction correlated strongly to mass removed manually (R(2) = 0.954, slope = 1.02 ± 0.04), mass lost during simulator testing (R(2) = 0.935, slope = 1.01 ± 0.07) and visual damage scores separated by size (R(2)large = 0.9824, R(2)small = 0.9728). These results suggest that an autonomous mathematical reconstruction can be used to effectively measure volume loss in retrieved tibial inserts.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22915471      PMCID: PMC3637029          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  31 in total

1.  In vivo measurement of volumetric wear of a total knee replacement.

Authors:  H S Gill; J C Waite; A Short; C F Kellett; A J Price; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components.

Authors:  Roy D Crowninshield; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua J Jacobs; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Quantification of polyethylene degradation in mobile bearing knees: a retrieval analysis of the Anterior-Posterior-Glide (APG) and Rotating Platform (RP) Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee.

Authors:  Alan M Kop; Eric Swarts
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation.

Authors:  Melinda K Harman; John DesJardins; Lisa Benson; Scott A Banks; Martine LaBerge; W Andrew Hodge
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Analysis of retrieved ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene tibial components from rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan M Garcia; Matthew J Kraay; Patrick J Messerschmitt; Victor M Goldberg; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Unicompartmental knee prostheses: in vitro wear assessment of the menisci tibial insert after two different fixation methods.

Authors:  S Affatato; M Spinelli; M Zavalloni; S Carmignato; N Lopomo; M Marcacci; M Viceconti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Improvement in the assessment of wear of total knee replacements using coordinate-measuring machine techniques.

Authors:  L A Blunt; P J Bills; X-Q Jiang; G Chakrabarty
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 9.  Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas D R Naudie; Deborah J Ammeen; Gerard A Engh; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert.

Authors:  Orhun K Muratoglu; Harry E Rubash; Charles R Bragdon; Brian R Burroughs; Anna Huang; William H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

1.  Finite element evaluation of the newest ISO testing standard for polyethylene total knee replacement liners.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Spencer Fullam; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Relationship of surface damage appearance and volumetric wear in retrieved TKR polyethylene liners.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Priyanka Bhutani; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Christopher B Knowlton; Deborah J Hall; Michel P Laurent; Robert M Urban; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Joint line elevation and tibial slope are associated with increased polyethylene wear in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Johannes Cip; Elmira Rad; Michel P Laurent; Richard A Berger; Joshua J Jacobs; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.494

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.