Literature DB >> 27401236

Relationship of surface damage appearance and volumetric wear in retrieved TKR polyethylene liners.

Christopher B Knowlton1,2, Priyanka Bhutani2, Markus A Wimmer1,2.   

Abstract

Recently developed techniques have enabled volume loss measurements on surgically retrieved total knee replacements (TKR). However, it is not well understood how volume loss relates to polyethylene surface damage appearance. Sixty-four fixed bearing cruciate retaining components retrieved from revision and postmortem surgeries were analyzed for penetration and volume loss on the topside articular surface. An autonomous reconstruction method was used to approximate the original unworn surfaces. Surface damage patterns were also mapped using a video microscope, and each pattern's contribution to volume loss was calculated. With consideration for creep, a total wear rate of 12.9 ± 5.97 mm3 /year was found for the population. The penetration rate was 0.035 ± 0.017 mm/year medially and 0.034 ± 0.011 mm/year laterally, of which the location on the plateau varied greatly. Although striated patterns contributed to most to volume loss, damage patterns generally were only moderate predictors of material volume loss.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 2053-2059, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee replacement; polyethylene (UHMWPE); retrieval analysis; volume reconstruction; wear

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27401236      PMCID: PMC5233657          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  31 in total

1.  In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; David D McErlain; Jan-M Brandt; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J Macdonald; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo measurement of volumetric wear of a total knee replacement.

Authors:  H S Gill; J C Waite; A Short; C F Kellett; A J Price; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Clinical wear measurement on low contact stress rotating platform knee bearings.

Authors:  Sara A Atwood; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; John P Collier; Douglas W Van Citters; Francis E Kennedy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh; Rebecca L Zimmerman; Nancy L Parks; C Anderson Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement.

Authors:  Annegret Mündermann; Chris O Dyrby; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Manufacturing lot affects polyethylene tibial insert volume, thickness, and surface geometry.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Jaques S Milner; Steven J MacDonald; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Wear and creep behavior of total knee implants undergoing wear testing.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Amit Parikh; Marc Taylor; Jeff Sprague; Douglas D Naudie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses.

Authors:  R W Hood; T M Wright; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1983-09

9.  Polyethylene wear in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 47 bearings.

Authors:  B J L Kendrick; D Longino; H Pandit; U Svard; H S Gill; C A F Dodd; D W Murray; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

10.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; Paul M Lichstein; Chao Shen; Anthony T Tokarski; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  6 in total

1.  Retrieval analysis of contemporary antioxidant polyethylene: multiple material and design changes may decrease implant performance.

Authors:  Arianna Cerquiglini; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Lukas B Moser; Antti Eskelinen; Michael T Hirschmann; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Wear Scar Similarities between Retrieved and Simulator-Tested Polyethylene TKR Components: An Artificial Neural Network Approach.

Authors:  Diego A Orozco Villaseñor; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Albumin Protein Cleavage Affects the Wear and Friction of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene.

Authors:  Yasha Dwivedi; Michel P Laurent; Shravan Sarvepalli; Thomas M Schmid; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Lubricants       Date:  2017-08-17

5.  3D patient imaging and retrieval analysis help understand the clinical importance of rotation in knee replacements.

Authors:  Arianna Cerquiglini; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Niccoló Rotigliano; Michael T Hirschmann; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparative retrieval analysis of antioxidant polyethylene: bonding of vitamin-E does not reduce in-vivo surface damage.

Authors:  Dominic T Mathis; Joshua Schmidli; Michael T Hirschmann; Felix Amsler; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Alister Hart
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.