Literature DB >> 17400100

Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert.

Orhun K Muratoglu1, Harry E Rubash, Charles R Bragdon, Brian R Burroughs, Anna Huang, William H Harris.   

Abstract

Polyethylene wear can compromise long-term performance of total knees. We investigated articular and backside wear rate of tibial inserts made from conventional vs highly cross-linked polyethylenes. The inserts were tested on a knee simulator at a frequency of 1.1 Hz using normal gait kinematics with a 7 degrees posterior slope for 7 million cycles. Gravimetrically, the combined articular and backside wear rate was 23 +/- 6 and 4.6 +/- 2 mm(3) per million cycles for the conventional and cross-linked inserts, respectively. We independently measured articular surface wear rates, which were 15 +/- 4 and 5 +/- 2 mm(3) per million cycles for conventional and cross-linked inserts, respectively. Electron beam cross-linked and subsequently melted polyethylene reduced the wear rate of polyethylene on articular and backside surfaces in a cruciate-retaining total knee design when tested on a knee simulator under simulated normal gait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400100     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; David D McErlain; Jan-M Brandt; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J Macdonald; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Finite element evaluation of the newest ISO testing standard for polyethylene total knee replacement liners.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Spencer Fullam; Markus A Wimmer; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis?

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; Robert B Bourne; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Hodrick; Erik P Severson; Deborah S McAlister; Brian Dahl; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  CORR Insights(®): Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.

Authors:  Harry A McKellop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Steven Kurtz; Rebecca Love; Guy Cafri; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Rebecca L Zimmerman; Robert H Hopper; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Christina Esposito; Marcella Elpers; Timothy Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Is There a Benefit to Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior-stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.