Literature DB >> 32374428

Joint line elevation and tibial slope are associated with increased polyethylene wear in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Robin Pourzal1, Johannes Cip2, Elmira Rad1, Michel P Laurent1, Richard A Berger1, Joshua J Jacobs1, Markus A Wimmer1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrieval study was to determine the effect of implant positioning on wear, taking patient-related factors into account. Therefore, the volumetric material loss of 59 retrieved tibial liners was quantitatively determined using a coordinate measuring-machine. All retrievals were made of the same polyethylene and design by a single manufacturer. Using time in-situ and linear regression, a wear rate for each liner was determined and corrected for bedding-in. Backside damage was qualitatively scored. The following implant positioning parameters were obtained from radiographs: anatomical lateral-distal femoral angle, anatomical medial-proximal tibial angle, femoral tilt angle, and posterior tibial slope. The patella position was assessed by the Blackburne-Peel index and the Insall-Salvati ratio. Unlike the Insall-Salvati ratio, the Blackburne-Peel index is known to detect surgical joint line elevation. Using general linear modeling the most impactful factors on wear rate and backside damage was determined, thereby taking patient demographic factors into account. The mean volumetric wear rate was 11.6 mm3 /y. Wear decreased with older age (P = .021) and female sex (P = .001). The wear rate increased with joint line elevation as indicated from a decreased Blackburne-Peel index (P = .019), and increased with increased posterior tibial slope (P = .026). The backside damage score also increased with joint line elevation (P = .036). A Blackburne-Peel index decrease of 0.1, signifying joint line elevation, was found to increase the wear rate by 1.8 mm3 /y and increase back-sided wear. A high tibial slope (>7°) led to a 9.3 mm3 /y increase in wear rate compared with a low tibial slope (<3°). The results of this study demonstrate that tibial liner positioning has a significant impact on polyethylene wear with potential implications on osteolysis over time.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant retrieval analysis; joint line elevation; polyethylene wear; total knee arthroplasty; wear volume

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32374428      PMCID: PMC7329363          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  35 in total

1.  Surface damage versus tibial polyethylene insert conformity: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Markus A Wimmer; Michel P Laurent; Jeannie D Haman; Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Influence of the posterior tibial slope on the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Toshio Doi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Patella position in the normal knee joint.

Authors:  J Insall; E Salvati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Mechanical, Anatomical, and Kinematic Axis in TKA: Concepts and Practical Applications.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Cherian; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Samik Banerjee; Julio J Jauregui; Kimona Issa; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

6.  Wear, delamination, and fatigue resistance of melt-annealed highly crosslinked UHMWPE cruciate-retaining knee inserts under activities of daily living.

Authors:  Oludele O Popoola; Jian Q Yao; Todd S Johnson; Cheryl R Blanchard
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  "Backside" polyethylene deformation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Toshihiro Akisue; Motoi Yamaguchi; Thomas W Bauer; Satoshi Takikawa; Jean P Schils; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 9.  How active are patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?: A systematic review.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Backside wear of tibial polyethylene components is affected by gait pattern: A knee simulator study using rare earth tracer technology.

Authors:  Valentina Ngai; Joachim Kunze; Johannes Cip; Michel P Laurent; Joshua J Jacobs; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  3 in total

1.  Optimal surgical component alignment minimizes TKR wear - An in silico study with nine alignment parameters.

Authors:  Steven P Mell; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Are Damage Modes Related to Microstructure and Material Loss in Severely Damaged CoCrMo Femoral Heads?

Authors:  Stephanie M McCarthy; Deborah J Hall; Mathew T Mathew; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg; Robin Pourzal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Robotic Arm Technology.

Authors:  Micah MacAskill; Baylor Blickenstaff; Alexander Caughran; Matthew Bullock
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-12-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.