Literature DB >> 17403800

Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Steven Kurtz1, Kevin Ong, Edmund Lau, Fionna Mowat, Michael Halpern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of revision total hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the United States. The purpose of this study was to formulate projections for the number of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties that will be performed in the United States through 2030.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1990 to 2003) was used in conjunction with United States Census Bureau data to quantify primary and revision arthroplasty rates as a function of age, gender, race and/or ethnicity, and census region. Projections were performed with use of Poisson regression on historical procedure rates in combination with population projections from 2005 to 2030.
RESULTS: By 2030, the demand for primary total hip arthroplasties is estimated to grow by 174% to 572,000. The demand for primary total knee arthroplasties is projected to grow by 673% to 3.48 million procedures. The demand for hip revision procedures is projected to double by the year 2026, while the demand for knee revisions is expected to double by 2015. Although hip revisions are currently more frequently performed than knee revisions, the demand for knee revisions is expected to surpass the demand for hip revisions after 2007. Overall, total hip and total knee revisions are projected to grow by 137% and 601%, respectively, between 2005 and 2030.
CONCLUSIONS: These large projected increases in demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons needed to perform these procedures and the deployment of appropriate resources to serve this need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403800     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  1941 in total

1.  Racial Disparity in the Perioperative Care for Patients Undergoing Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ahmad Elsharydah; Ahmed S Embabi; Abu Minhajuddin; Girish P Joshi
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Introducing a knee endoprosthesis model increases risk of early revision surgery.

Authors:  Mikko Peltola; Antti Malmivaara; Mika Paavola
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital prosthesis-related complications following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study.

Authors:  Qinfeng Yang; Jian Wang; Yichuan Xu; Yuhang Chen; Qiang Lian; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A SIX-WEEK SUPERVISED EXERCISE AND EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A CASE SERIES.

Authors:  Federico Pozzi; Kathleen Madara; Joseph A Zeni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

5.  Macromolecular prodrug of dexamethasone prevents particle-induced peri-implant osteolysis with reduced systemic side effects.

Authors:  Ke Ren; Anand Dusad; Fang Yuan; Hongjiang Yuan; P Edward Purdue; Edward V Fehringer; Kevin L Garvin; Steven R Goldring; Dong Wang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Patient-level clinically meaningful improvements in activities of daily living and pain after total hip arthroplasty: data from a large US institutional registry.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Kevin J Bozic; Ting Jung Pan; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan?

Authors:  Yasuhiko Kasahara; Tokifumi Majima; Shoichi Kimura; Osamu Nishiike; Jun Uchida
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Predictors of hospital readmission following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philip J Belmont; Gens P Goodman; Marina Rodriguez; Julia O Bader; Brian R Waterman; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Total joint replacement and blood loss: what is the best equation?

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.