Literature DB >> 22892760

Heating induced near deep brain stimulation lead electrodes during magnetic resonance imaging with a 3 T transceive volume head coil.

Devashish Shrivastava1, Aviva Abosch, John Hughes, Ute Goerke, Lance DelaBarre, Rachana Visaria, Noam Harel, J Thomas Vaughan.   

Abstract

Heating induced near deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead electrodes during magnetic resonance imaging with a 3 T transceive head coil was measured, modeled, and imaged in three cadaveric porcine heads (mean body weight = 85.47 ± 3.19 kg, mean head weight = 5.78 ± 0.32 kg). The effect of the placement of the extra-cranial portion of the DBS lead on the heating was investigated by looping the extra-cranial lead on the top, side, and back of the head, and placing it parallel to the coil's longitudinal axial direction. The heating was induced using a 641 s long turbo spin echo sequence with the mean whole head average specific absorption rate of 3.16 W kg(-1). Temperatures were measured using fluoroptic probes at the scalp, first and second electrodes from the distal lead tip, and 6 mm distal from electrode 1 (T(6 mm)). The heating was modeled using the maximum T(6 mm) and imaged using a proton resonance frequency shift-based MR thermometry method. Results showed that the heating was significantly reduced when the extra-cranial lead was placed in the longitudinal direction compared to the other placements (peak temperature change = 1.5-3.2 °C versus 5.1-24.7 °C). Thermal modeling and MR thermometry may be used together to determine the heating and improve patient safety online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892760      PMCID: PMC3469254          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/17/5651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of four magnetic resonance methods for mapping small temperature changes.

Authors:  W Wlodarczyk; M Hentschel; P Wust; R Noeske; N Hosten; H Rinneberg; R Felix
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: in vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Ali R Rezai; Daniel Finelli; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Jean Tkach; Ashwini Sharan; Paul Rugieri; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study.

Authors:  Daniel A Finelli; Ali R Rezai; Paul M Ruggieri; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Ashwini Sharan; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Active deep brain stimulation during MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  J-C Georgi; C Stippich; V M Tronnier; S Heiland
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Roongroj Bhidayasiri; Jeff M Bronstein; Shantanu Sinha; Scott E Krahl; Sinyeob Ahn; Eric J Behnke; Mark S Cohen; Robert Frysinger; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Noninvasive monitoring of brain temperature during mild hypothermia.

Authors:  Jan Weis; Lucian Covaciu; Sten Rubertsson; Mats Allers; Anders Lunderquist; Håkan Ahlström
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey.

Authors:  C Gabriel; S Gabriel; E Corthout
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Ex vivo tissue-type independence in proton-resonance frequency shift MR thermometry.

Authors:  R D Peters; R S Hinks; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Noninvasive MR thermometry using paramagnetic lanthanide complexes of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclodoecane-alpha,alpha',alpha'',alpha'''-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTMA4-).

Authors:  S K Hekmatyar; Paige Hopewell; Sait Kubilay Pakin; Andriy Babsky; Navin Bansal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Quantitatively validating the efficacy of artifact suppression techniques to study the cortical consequences of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Matthew J Boring; Zachary F Jessen; Thomas A Wozny; Michael J Ward; Ashley C Whiteman; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Maria Ida Iacono; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Michael D Fox; Todd Herrington; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Cristen LaPierre; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Orientation selective deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Lauri J Lehto; Julia P Slopsema; Matthew D Johnson; Artem Shatillo; Benjamin A Teplitzky; Lynn Utecht; Gregor Adriany; Silvia Mangia; Alejandra Sierra; Walter C Low; Olli Gröhn; Shalom Michaeli
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close-fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Boris Keil; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar; Azma Mareyam; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; Maria Ida Iacono; Husam Katnani; Lawrence L Wald; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Development and testing of implanted carbon electrodes for electromagnetic field mapping during neuromodulation.

Authors:  Neeta Ashok Kumar; Munish Chauhan; Sri Kirthi Kandala; Sung-Min Sohn; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Dual-echo Z-shimmed proton resonance frequency-shift magnetic resonance thermometry near metallic ablation probes: Technique and temperature precision.

Authors:  Yuxin Zhang; Megan E Poorman; William A Grissom
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davidson; Fred Tam; Benson Yang; Ying Meng; Clement Hamani; Simon J Graham; Nir Lipsman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.