Literature DB >> 26269552

Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Ahmad Alhourani1, Michael M McDowell1, Michael J Randazzo1, Thomas A Wozny1, Efstathios D Kondylis1, Witold J Lipski1, Sarah Beck1, Jordan F Karp2, Avniel S Ghuman3, R Mark Richardson4.   

Abstract

The ability to differentially alter specific brain functions via deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents a monumental advance in clinical neuroscience, as well as within medicine as a whole. Despite the efficacy of DBS in the treatment of movement disorders, for which it is often the gold-standard therapy when medical management becomes inadequate, the mechanisms through which DBS in various brain targets produces therapeutic effects is still not well understood. This limited knowledge is a barrier to improving efficacy and reducing side effects in clinical brain stimulation. A field of study related to assessing the network effects of DBS is gradually emerging that promises to reveal aspects of the underlying pathophysiology of various brain disorders and their response to DBS that will be critical to advancing the field. This review summarizes the nascent literature related to network effects of DBS measured by cerebral blood flow and metabolic imaging, functional imaging, and electrophysiology (scalp and intracranial electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) in order to establish a framework for future studies.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep brain stimulation; electrocorticography; magnetoencephalography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269552      PMCID: PMC4595613          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00275.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  173 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons.

Authors:  C Beurrier; B Bioulac; J Audin; C Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Blood flow responses to deep brain stimulation of thalamus.

Authors:  J S Perlmutter; J W Mink; A J Bastian; K Zackowski; T Hershey; E Miyawaki; W Koller; T O Videen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Changes in cerebral activity pattern due to subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  P Limousin; J Greene; P Pollak; J Rothwell; A L Benabid; R Frackowiak
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Metabolic imaging of anterior capsular stimulation in refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a key role for the subgenual anterior cingulate and ventral striatum.

Authors:  Koenraad Van Laere; Bart Nuttin; Loes Gabriels; Patrick Dupont; Steve Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg; Paul Cosyns
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Double-blind clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  Linda Ackermans; Annelien Duits; Chris van der Linden; Marina Tijssen; Koen Schruers; Yasin Temel; Mariska Kleijer; Pieter Nederveen; Richard Bruggeman; Selma Tromp; Vivianne van Kranen-Mastenbroek; Herman Kingma; Danielle Cath; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Regional cerebral blood flow measured during symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder using oxygen 15-labeled carbon dioxide and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  S L Rauch; M A Jenike; N M Alpert; L Baer; H C Breiter; C R Savage; A J Fischman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1994-01

Review 8.  Non-motor functions in parkinsonian patients implanted in the pedunculopontine nucleus: focus on sleep and cognitive domains.

Authors:  Stefani Alessandro; Roberto Ceravolo; Livia Brusa; Mariangela Pierantozzi; Alberto Costa; Salvatore Galati; Fabio Placidi; Andrea Romigi; Cesare Iani; Francesco Marzetti; Antonella Peppe
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus affects resting EEG and visual evoked potentials in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Robert Jech; Evzen Růzicka; Dusan Urgosík; Tereza Serranová; Markéta Volfová; Olga Nováková; Jan Roth; Petr Dusek; Petr Mecír
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  STN-stimulation in Parkinson's disease restores striatal inhibition of thalamocortical projection.

Authors:  Jacob Geday; Karen Østergaard; Erik Johnsen; Albert Gjedde
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  22 in total

1.  Quantitatively validating the efficacy of artifact suppression techniques to study the cortical consequences of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Matthew J Boring; Zachary F Jessen; Thomas A Wozny; Michael J Ward; Ashley C Whiteman; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Intrinsic network architecture predicts the effects elicited by intracranial electrical stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  Kieran C R Fox; Lin Shi; Sori Baek; Omri Raccah; Brett L Foster; Srijani Saha; Daniel S Margulies; Aaron Kucyi; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-07-06

3.  Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus increases pointing error during memory-guided sequential reaching.

Authors:  Fabian J David; Lisa C Goelz; Ruth Z Tangonan; Leonard Verhagen Metman; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pallidal deep brain stimulation modulates excessive cortical high β phase amplitude coupling in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Nicholas AuYong; Joni Ricks-Oddie; Yvette Bordelon; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Integrative and Network-Specific Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Defined in Individuals.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Scott Marek; Evan M Gordon; Joshua S Siegel; Caterina Gratton; Timothy O Laumann; Adrian W Gilmore; Jeffrey J Berg; Annie L Nguyen; Donna Dierker; Andrew N Van; Mario Ortega; Dillan J Newbold; Jacqueline M Hampton; Ashley N Nielsen; Kathleen B McDermott; Jarod L Roland; Scott A Norris; Steven M Nelson; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Intensity of affective experience is modulated by magnitude of intracranial electrical stimulation in human orbitofrontal, cingulate and insular cortices.

Authors:  Jennifer Yih; Danielle E Beam; Kieran C R Fox; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Targeted neural network interventions for auditory hallucinations: Can TMS inform DBS?

Authors:  Joseph J Taylor; John H Krystal; Deepak C D'Souza; Jason Lee Gerrard; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation increases fixational saccades during movement preparation: evidence for impaired preparatory set.

Authors:  Lisa C Goelz; Maya Cottongim; Leonard Verhagen Metman; Daniel M Corcos; Fabian J David
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Neurofeedback of Cortical Target Enhances Hippocampal Activation and Memory Performance.

Authors:  Xin Hou; Xiang Xiao; Yilong Gong; Yihan Jiang; Peipei Sun; Juan Li; Zheng Li; Xiaojie Zhao; Li Yao; Antao Chen; Chaozhe Zhu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.271

10.  Model-based deconstruction of cortical evoked potentials generated by subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Karthik Kumaravelu; Chintan S Oza; Christina E Behrend; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.