Literature DB >> 11891968

Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: in vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 1.5 tesla.

Ali R Rezai1, Daniel Finelli, John A Nyenhuis, Greg Hrdlicka, Jean Tkach, Ashwini Sharan, Paul Rugieri, Paul H Stypulkowski, Frank G Shellock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related heating for a neurostimulation system (Activa Tremor Control System, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) used for chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different configurations were evaluated for bilateral neurostimulators (Soletra Model 7426), extensions, and leads to assess worst-case and clinically relevant positioning scenarios. In vitro testing was performed using a 1.5-T/64-MHz MR system and a gel-filled phantom designed to approximate the head and upper torso of a human subject. MRI was conducted using the transmit/receive body and transmit/receive head radio frequency (RF) coils. Various levels of RF energy were applied with the transmit/receive body (whole-body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR); range, 0.98-3.90 W/kg) and transmit/receive head (whole-body averaged SAR; range, 0.07-0.24 W/kg) coils. A fluoroptic thermometry system was used to record temperatures at multiple locations before (1 minute) and during (15 minutes) MRI.
RESULTS: Using the body RF coil, the highest temperature changes ranged from 2.5 degrees-25.3 degrees C. Using the head RF coil, the highest temperature changes ranged from 2.3 degrees-7.1 degrees C.Thus, these findings indicated that substantial heating occurs under certain conditions, while others produce relatively minor, physiologically inconsequential temperature increases.
CONCLUSION: The temperature increases were dependent on the type of RF coil, level of SAR used, and how the lead wires were positioned. Notably, the use of clinically relevant positioning techniques for the neurostimulation system and low SARs commonly used for imaging the brain generated little heating. Based on this information, MR safety guidelines are provided. These observations are restricted to the tested neurostimulation system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11891968     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  42 in total

1.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study.

Authors:  Daniel A Finelli; Ali R Rezai; Paul M Ruggieri; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Ashwini Sharan; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Analysis of the role of lead resistivity in specific absorption rate for deep brain stimulator leads at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Leonardo M Angelone; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Detachable coil for cerebral aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 3T.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Matthew Gounis; Ajay Wakhloo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  MRI-related heating near deep brain stimulation electrodes: more data are needed.

Authors:  Akshay A Gupte; Devashish Shrivastava; Maggie A Spaniol; Aviva Abosch
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Cortical magnetoencephalography of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of postural tremor.

Authors:  Allison T Connolly; Jawad A Bajwa; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  MR fingerprinting using the quick echo splitting NMR imaging technique.

Authors:  Yun Jiang; Dan Ma; Renate Jerecic; Jeffrey Duerk; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Measurements of RF heating during 3.0-T MRI of a pig implanted with deep brain stimulator.

Authors:  Krzysztof R Gorny; Michael F Presti; Stephan J Goerss; Sun C Hwang; Dong-Pyo Jang; Inyong Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Yunhong Shu; Christopher P Favazza; Kendall H Lee; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Deep brain stimulation induces BOLD activation in motor and non-motor networks: an fMRI comparison study of STN and EN/GPi DBS in large animals.

Authors:  Hoon-Ki Min; Sun-Chul Hwang; Michael P Marsh; Inyong Kim; Emily Knight; Bryan Striemer; Joel P Felmlee; Kirk M Welker; Charles D Blaha; Su-Youne Chang; Kevin E Bennet; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  The preoperative neurological evaluation.

Authors:  John Probasco; Bogachan Sahin; Tung Tran; Tae Hwan Chung; Liana Shapiro Rosenthal; Zoltan Mari; Michael Levy
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-10

10.  Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: radiofrequency-induced heating.

Authors:  David W Carmichael; John S Thornton; Roman Rodionov; Rachel Thornton; Andrew McEvoy; Philip J Allen; Louis Lemieux
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.