Literature DB >> 15919600

Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain.

Roongroj Bhidayasiri1, Jeff M Bronstein, Shantanu Sinha, Scott E Krahl, Sinyeob Ahn, Eric J Behnke, Mark S Cohen, Robert Frysinger, Frank G Shellock.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used increasingly in the field of movement disorders. The implanted electrodes create not only a prior risk to patient safety during MRI, but also a unique opportunity in the collection of functional MRI data conditioned by direct neural stimulation. We evaluated MRI-related heating for bilateral neurostimulation systems used for DBS with an emphasis on assessing clinically relevant imaging parameters. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed using transmit body radiofrequency (RF) coil and receive-only head RF coil at various specific absorption rates (SARs) of RF power. In vitro testing was performed using a gel-filled phantom with temperatures recorded at the electrode tips. Each DBS electrode was positioned with a single extension loop around each pulse generator and a single loop at the "head" end of the phantom. Various pulse sequences were used for MRI including fast spin-echo, echo-planar imaging, magnetization transfer contrast and gradient-echo techniques. The MRI sequences had calculated whole-body averaged SARs and local head SARs ranging from 0.1 to 1.6 W/kg and 0.1 to 3.2 W/kg, respectively. Temperature elevations of less than 1.0 degrees C were found with the fast spin-echo, magnetization transfer contrast, gradient-echo and echo-planar clinical imaging sequences. Using the highest SAR levels, whole-body averaged, 1.6 W/kg, local exposed-body, 3.2 W/kg, and local head, 2.9 W/kg, the temperature increase was 2.1 degrees C. These results showed that temperature elevations associated with clinical sequences were within an acceptable physiologically safe range for the MR conditions used in this evaluation, especially for the use of relatively low SAR levels. Notably, these findings are highly specific to the neurostimulation systems, device positioning technique, MR system and imaging conditions used in this investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919600     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  12 in total

1.  Effect of the extracranial deep brain stimulation lead on radiofrequency heating at 9.4 Tesla (400.2 MHz).

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Aviva Abosch; Timothy Hanson; Jinfeng Tian; Akshay Gupte; Paul A Iaizzo; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Heating induced near deep brain stimulation lead electrodes during magnetic resonance imaging with a 3 T transceive volume head coil.

Authors:  Devashish Shrivastava; Aviva Abosch; John Hughes; Ute Goerke; Lance DelaBarre; Rachana Visaria; Noam Harel; J Thomas Vaughan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert consensus and review of key issues.

Authors:  Jeff M Bronstein; Michele Tagliati; Ron L Alterman; Andres M Lozano; Jens Volkmann; Alessandro Stefani; Fay B Horak; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Paul Krack; Rajesh Pahwa; Jaimie M Henderson; Marwan I Hariz; Roy A Bakay; Ali Rezai; William J Marks; Elena Moro; Jerrold L Vitek; Frances M Weaver; Robert E Gross; Mahlon R DeLong
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-10-11

5.  Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davidson; Fred Tam; Benson Yang; Ying Meng; Clement Hamani; Simon J Graham; Nir Lipsman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs.

Authors:  Jerold S Shinbane; Patrick M Colletti; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatibility of the Polymer-based Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Jin Ho Kim; Kyou Sik Min; Soon Kwan An; Joon Soo Jeong; Sang Beom Jun; Min Hyoung Cho; Young-Don Son; Zang-Hee Cho; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Joshua Kahan; Anastasia Papadaki; Mark White; Laura Mancini; Tarek Yousry; Ludvic Zrinzo; Patricia Limousin; Marwan Hariz; Tom Foltynie; John Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: radiofrequency-induced heating.

Authors:  David W Carmichael; John S Thornton; Roman Rodionov; Rachel Thornton; Andrew McEvoy; Philip J Allen; Louis Lemieux
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Neuroimaging and deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  D Dormont; D Seidenwurm; D Galanaud; P Cornu; J Yelnik; E Bardinet
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 4.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.