Literature DB >> 31154045

Quantitatively validating the efficacy of artifact suppression techniques to study the cortical consequences of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography.

Matthew J Boring1, Zachary F Jessen2, Thomas A Wozny3, Michael J Ward3, Ashley C Whiteman3, R Mark Richardson4, Avniel Singh Ghuman4.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and effective treatment for several movement disorders and is being developed to treat a host of neuropsychiatric disorders including epilepsy, chronic pain, obsessive compulsive disorder, and depression. However, the neural mechanisms through which DBS produces therapeutic benefits, and in some cases unwanted side effects, in these disorders are only partially understood. Non-invasive neuroimaging techniques that can assess the neural effects of active stimulation are important for advancing our understanding of the neural basis of DBS therapy. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a safe, passive imaging modality with relatively high spatiotemporal resolution, which makes it a potentially powerful method for examining the cortical network effects of DBS. However, the degree to which magnetic artifacts produced by stimulation and the associated hardware can be suppressed from MEG data, and the comparability between signals measured during DBS-on and DBS-off conditions, have not been fully quantified. The present study used machine learning methods in conjunction with a visual perception task, which should be relatively unaffected by DBS, to quantify how well neural data can be salvaged from artifact contamination introduced by DBS and how comparable DBS-on and DBS-off data are after artifact removal. Machine learning also allowed us to determine whether the spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity recorded during stimulation are comparable to those recorded when stimulation is off. The spatiotemporal patterns of visually evoked neural fields could be accurately classified in all 8 patients with DBS implants during both DBS-on and DBS-off conditions and performed comparably across those two conditions. Further, the classification accuracy for classifiers trained on the spatiotemporal patterns evoked during DBS-on trials and applied to DBS-off trials, and vice versa, were similar to that of the classifiers trained and tested on either trial type, demonstrating the comparability of these patterns across conditions. Together, these results demonstrate the ability of MEG preprocessing techniques, like temporal signal space separation, to salvage neural data from recordings contaminated with DBS artifacts and validate MEG as a powerful tool to study the cortical consequences of DBS.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Magnetoencephalography; Movement disorders; Multivariate pattern analysis; Parkinson's disease; Preprocessing; Temporal signal space separation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31154045      PMCID: PMC6688933          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  47 in total

1.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study.

Authors:  Daniel A Finelli; Ali R Rezai; Paul M Ruggieri; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Ashwini Sharan; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Active deep brain stimulation during MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  J-C Georgi; C Stippich; V M Tronnier; S Heiland
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Probabilistic analysis of activation volumes generated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Scott E Cooper; Jaimie M Henderson; Barbara Wolgamuth; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Cortical magnetoencephalography of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of postural tremor.

Authors:  Allison T Connolly; Jawad A Bajwa; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Rejecting deep brain stimulation artefacts from MEG data using ICA and mutual information.

Authors:  Omid Abbasi; Jan Hirschmann; Georg Schmitz; Alfons Schnitzler; Markus Butz
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 6.  Deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Joel S Perlmutter; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Resting state cortical oscillations of patients with Parkinson disease and with and without subthalamic deep brain stimulation: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Chunyan Cao; Dianyou Li; Tianxiao Jiang; Nuri Firat Ince; Shikun Zhan; Jing Zhang; Zhiyi Sha; Bomin Sun
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Christopher R Butson; Scott F Lempka; Scott E Cooper; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Deep brain stimulation for chronic pain investigated with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Morten L Kringelbach; Ned Jenkinson; Alexander L Green; Sarah L F Owen; Peter C Hansen; Piers L Cornelissen; Ian E Holliday; John Stein; Tipu Z Aziz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  The Use of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence.

Authors:  Lucia M Alba-Ferrara; Francisco Fernandez; Gabriel A de Erausquin
Journal:  Addict Disord Their Treat       Date:  2014-03-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease induces spontaneous cortical hypersynchrony in extended motor and cognitive networks.

Authors:  Maxwell B Wang; Matthew J Boring; Michael J Ward; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  Motor effects of deep brain stimulation correlate with increased functional connectivity in Parkinson's disease: An MEG study.

Authors:  Lennard I Boon; Arjan Hillebrand; Wouter V Potters; Rob M A de Bie; Naomi Prent; Maarten Bot; P Richard Schuurman; Cornelis J Stam; Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar; Henk W Berendse
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  Modulation of sensory cortical activity by deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Olesia Korsun; Hanna Renvall; Jussi Nurminen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Eero Pekkonen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.698

4.  The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings.

Authors:  Ahmet Levent Kandemir; Vladimir Litvak; Esther Florin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.