| Literature DB >> 22764110 |
Isabel Gordo1, Paulo R A Campos.
Abstract
Populations facing novel environments are expected to evolve through the accumulation of adaptive substitutions. The dynamics of adaptation depend on the fitness landscape and possibly on the genetic background on which new mutations arise. Here, we model the dynamics of adaptive evolution at the phenotypic and genotypic levels, focusing on a Fisherian landscape characterized by a single peak. We find that Fisher's geometrical model of adaptation, extended to allow for small random environmental variations, is able to explain several features made recently in experimentally evolved populations. Consistent with data on populations evolving under controlled conditions, the model predicts that mean population fitness increases rapidly when populations face novel environments and then achieves a dynamic plateau, the rate of molecular evolution is remarkably constant over long periods of evolution, mutators are expected to invade and patterns of epistasis vary along the adaptive walk. Negative epistasis is expected in the initial steps of adaptation but not at later steps, a prediction that remains to be tested. Furthermore, populations are expected to exhibit high levels of phenotypic diversity at all times during their evolution. This implies that populations are possibly able to adapt rapidly to novel abiotic environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22764110 PMCID: PMC3565474 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Lett ISSN: 1744-9561 Impact factor: 3.703
Figure 1.(a) Dynamics of fitness increase and (b) divergence (number of mutations accumulated) under FGM with a shaking peak. W0 = 0.5, N = 107, U = 0.001, σ2 = 0.001 and n = 20. The optimum shakes every generation with a variance v. In the limit v → 0, we recover the classical FGM, where the mean effect of mutations at the optimum is −2%.
Figure 2.(a) Relative probability of fixation of a mutator (mutator advantage), with strength = 100, introduced at generation T (different bar colours). N = 104 σ2 = 0.001, n = 20, U = 0.001, W0 = 0.8. (b) Mean fitness effect of fixed mutations along the adaptive walk. The black bars represent a static landscape (v = 0), and the grey bars a randomly shaking optimum. N = 106 σ2 = 0.001, n = 20, U = 0.001, W0 = 0.5. (c) The mean within-population variance in trait values observed along the adaptive walk (at generation 10 000 the fitness plateau was already achieved). Black bars represent a static landscape (v = 0), and grey bars a randomly shaking optimum (v = 10−5). N = 105 σ2 = 0.001, n = 20, U = 0.001 and W0 = 0.5.