Literature DB >> 24335980

Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Tim Connallon1, Andrew G Clark.   

Abstract

Sexual antagonism, whereby mutations are favourable in one sex and disfavourable in the other, is common in natural populations, yet the root causes of sexual antagonism are rarely considered in evolutionary theories of adaptation. Here, we explore the evolutionary consequences of sex-differential selection and genotype-by-sex interactions for adaptation in species with separate sexes. We show that sexual antagonism emerges naturally from sex differences in the direction of selection on phenotypes expressed by both sexes or from sex-by-genotype interactions affecting the expression of such phenotypes. Moreover, modest sex differences in selection or genotype-by-sex effects profoundly influence the long-term evolutionary trajectories of populations with separate sexes, as these conditions trigger the evolution of strong sexual antagonism as a by-product of adaptively driven evolutionary change. The theory demonstrates that sexual antagonism is an inescapable by-product of adaptation in species with separate sexes, whether or not selection favours evolutionary divergence between males and females.

Keywords:  Fisher's geometric model; adaptation; evolutionary constraint; intralocus sexual conflict; pleiotropy; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24335980      PMCID: PMC3871308          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Adaptation and the cost of complexity.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  The genetic architecture of quantitative traits.

Authors:  T F Mackay
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  T M. Panhuis; R Butlin; M Zuk; T Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Modularity and the cost of complexity.

Authors:  John J Welch; David Waxman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Fisher's microscope and Haldane's ellipse.

Authors:  D Waxman; J J Welch
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Theories of adaptation: what they do and don't say.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Santiago F Elena; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial maintenance failure in aging and role of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  John Tower
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  Has adaptation occurred in males and females since separate sexes evolved in the plant Silene latifolia?

Authors:  Niklaus Zemp; Alex Widmer; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Debora Goedert; Aaron M Reedy; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Evolution of recombination rates between sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The distribution of fitness effects in an uncertain world.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Sexual dimorphism and rapid turnover in gene expression in pre-reproductive seedlings of a dioecious herb.

Authors:  Guillaume G Cossard; Melissa A Toups; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.